RCampus - Learning, ePortfolios, Assessments, Outcomes
Enter your login name here, or click here to go to the login page.
Enter your password:
forgot?   | click here to create a free account.
iRubric: Evaluative Criteria for Research Paper rubric

iRubric: Evaluative Criteria for Research Paper rubric

preview rubric

 

(draft) edit print email Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run apply to... delete

Evaluative Criteria for Research Paper built by jshalon5

Rubric Code: NX23W79
This rubric will be used to assess performance and provide feedback on the written assignment (research paper). Please use the
Draft    public Public Rubric

Directly link to this rubric or embed it on your website:
url:
link:
embed:
Keywords: (None)
Categories: Subjects: Education  
Types: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Quality of Work Submitted
Work submitted reflects collegiate level analytical and critical thinking skills as well as
  Poor
1 pts Submitted with unacceptable content
Minimal Work
2 pts Submitted with content meeting bare minimum requirement
Good
3 pts Submitted with content meeting, and at times, exceeding expectations
Exemplary
4 pts Submitted with content that exceeds assignment expectations
Knowledge/Comprehension
Ability to demonstrate understanding of the assignment
Poor

The written assignment lacks relevant or accurate information based on the assignment's criteria.
Minimal Work

Demonstrates some understanding of the assignment criteria.

Minimally includes answers to the required questions.
Good

The written assignment contains knowledge that is accurate, with only minor inaccuracies.

The data is relevant to the assignment and all questions have been answered in good detail.
Exemplary

Demonstrates a strong understanding of the assignment with relevant data and thorough, thought-provoking answers.
Ideas and Content
The extent to which the work reflects the student's ability to apply readings, discussions, cited resources, and course materials.
Poor

The written assignment does not contain research data, cited resources, or any supporting details to substantiate the written information.
Minimal Work

Minimally provides theories, concepts, supporting data, and cited resources.

Ideas are somewhat unclear and/or underdeveloped.
Good

Demonstrates good analytical structure with sufficient supporting resources such as, citations, articles, course readings, and other research data.

Ideas are clearly expressed.
Exemplary

Demonstrates insightful and critical thinking with research questions.

Ideas reflect originality with multiple credible sources including course readings, discussions, and other research data.

Demonstrates exceptional inclusion of major points.
Adhere to Assignment Expectations
The extent to which the research paper meets the assigned criteria
Poor

The written assignment does not include key components and lacks depth and application.
Minimal Work

Answers to questions are not fully developed and/or answers to all questions are not provided.

Assignment demonstrates minimal depth and breadth.

Features and benefits are not fully outlined.

Paper barely meets length requirements.
Good

Assignment demonstrates appropriate breadth and depth.

The paper is written in a detailed manner with fully developed thoughts.

Answers to questions are well-thought out and the paper meets length requirements.
Exemplary

Assignment demonstrates exceptional breadth and depth.

Assignment meets all expectations, with exemplary content, including length requirements.
Written Expression and Formatting
The extent to which the research paper uses standard English and formatting expectations (i.e. correct grammar, APA style).
Poor

The written assignment lacks the correct use of grammar, punctuation, and APA style formatting.
Minimal Work

Demonstrates some understanding of APA style and formatting.

Paper contains more than a few grammatical and punctual errors.
Good

Good use of grammar and APA style, formatting.

Few, if any, grammatical or punctual errors.
Exemplary

Great use of grammar with effective sentence variety, and clear, concise thought expression.

No prominent errors inter ere with reading.

Represents scholarly writing with correct APA format.



Discuss this rubric



Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be used for assessment.
 
To use this rubric for assessment, edit the rubric and change its setting from draft to ready to use.
 
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Bookmark this page:   RCampus RCampus   twit this twitter   delicious del.icio.us   digg Digg   facebook Facebook  
About Education Sites & Communities My Account Support
About RCampus
Terms of Use
Security & Privacy
Site Map
Case Studies
Classrooms
ePortfolios
Rubrics
Coursework
Grades
Book Exchange
Tutors
Website Gallery
Basic Groups
Study Groups
Club websites
Faculty Groups
My Account Settings
My Messages
My Calendar
My To-do List
My Favorites
My Documents
Free Sign up
Log in
Help & FAQ
Contact Us
Copyright © 2017 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.