Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Unorthodox Response- Bilingual Education rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Unorthodox Response- Bilingual Education
Unorthodox Response
Be creative! Represent one or more of the concepts presented on Baker’s Chapters 4, 5, 6 (Ex. additive and subtractive contexts, language loss, simultaneous acquisition, codeswitching, sequential bilingualism, etc.) via unorthodox means. Submit with a paragraph explaining rationale of your response. Responses will also be share in class.
Rubric Code:
KA2AX2
By
srarroyo
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Education
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate, Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Unorthodox Response
Excellent
2 pts
Good
1 pts
Poor
0 pts
Bilingual education concepts
Excellent
Specific concept (s) is selected from textbook.
Good
Concept(s) is generalized, with limited details from textbook.
Poor
No evidence of a specific concept(s) selection OR selection does not fit with those discussed in textbook.
Visual Appeal
Excellent
Project shows evidence of time and effort, grabs attention of the audience, invokes thought-provoking discussions.
Good
Project displays some time and effort, but also does not necessarily display connections in a visually appealing way.
Poor
Project does not display time and effort.
Creativity & Originality
Excellent
Response is very creative, shows evidence of originality and detailed connections.
Good
Response shows some creativity and originality while still remaining somewhat generalized.
Poor
Response does not show originality or creativity, does not display connections in a creative way.
Presentation
Excellent
Enhances the creation.
Good
Appears to be no connection between you and what you've created.
Poor
Not shared with the class; simply handed in to instructor.
Rationale
Excellent
Short summary includes details about the context of response. Connections are made to the selected concept(s).
Good
Short summary provides some context for the response. Very little depth and detail is used to describe the connections to the selected concept(s).
Poor
Short summary provides vague context for the response. No connections to the selected concept(s).
Keywords:
Non traditional learning
Subjects:
English
Education
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.