Skip to main content
iRubric: Vocal Performance Duets rubric

iRubric: Vocal Performance Duets rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Vocal Performance Duets 
Vocal Performance Exam
Rubric Code: H58WA9
By marbis
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Music  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Vocal Performance Exam
  Unacceptable

0 pts

Poor

10 pts

Fair

15 pts

Good

20 pts

Excellent

25 pts

Rhythmic Accuracy

Unacceptable

Incorrect rhythms consistently occur significantly detracting from the overall performance. Rhythms generally unrecognizable.
Poor

Incorrect rhythms frequently occur detracting from the overall performance.
Fair

Incorrect rhythms occasionally occur detracting from the overall performance.
Good

Incorrect rhythms rarely occur without detracting from the overall performance.
Excellent

Rhythms are consistently accurate as notated, enhancing the overall prformance. Professional level rhythmic accuracy.
Pitch Accuracy

Unacceptable

Incorrect pitches consistently occur significantly detracting from the overall performance. Pitches generally unrecognizable.
Poor

Incorrect pitches frequently occur detracting from the overall performance.
Fair

Incorrect pitches occasionally occur detracting from the overall performance.
Good

Incorrect pitches rarely occur without detracting from the overall performance.
Excellent

Pitches are consistently accurate as notated, enhancing the overall performance. Professional level pitch accuracy.
Intonation

Unacceptable

Intonation is never accurate, significantly detracting from the overall performance.
Poor

Intonation is rarely accurate, detracting from the overall performance.
Fair

Intonation is usually accurate, but detracting from the overall performance.
Good

Intonation is usually accurate without detracting for the overall performance.
Excellent

Intonation is consistently accurate during performance. Professional level intonation.
Phrasing

Unacceptable

Incorrect phrasing significantly detracting from the overall performance.
Poor

Incorrect phrasing frequently occur which is detracting from the performance.
Fair

Incorrect phrasing ocassionaly occur detracting from the performance.
Good

Incorrect phrasing rarely occurs without detracting from the overall performance.
Excellent

Phrasing is consistently accurate as notated, enhancing the overall performance. Professional level phrasing.
Diction

Unacceptable

Vowels are consistently inaccurate, consonants are consistently unclear, significantly detracting from the overall performance.
Poor

Vowels are frequently inaccurate, consonants are frequently unclear, detracting from the performance.
Fair

Vowels are occasionally inaccurate, consonants are occasionally unclear, detracting from the performance.
Good

Vowels are rarely inaccurate, consonants are rarely unclear without detracting from the overall performance.
Excellent

Vowels are stable and consistent; consonants are clear, crisp and appropriate to the language being sung enhancing the overall performance. Professional level diction.
Tone Quality

Unacceptable

Tone is never focused, clear, centered throughout the dynamic range, significantly detracting from the overall performance.
Poor

Tone is rarely focused, clear, centered throughout the dynamic range, detracting from the overall performance.
Fair

Tone is mostly focused, clear, centered throughout the dynamic range, detracting from the overall performance.
Good

Tone is usually focused, clear, centered and ringing tone throughout the dynamic range without detracting from the overall performance.
Excellent

Tone is consistently focused, clear, centered and ringing tone throught the dynamic range enhancing the overall performance. Professional tone quality.
Dynamics

Unacceptable

Dynamics are never accurate significantly detracting from the overall performance.
Poor

Dynamics are rarely accurate within the ensemble, detracting from the overall performance.
Fair

Dynamics are sometimes accurate detracting from the overall performance.
Good

Dynamcis are usually accurate without detracting from the overall performance.
Excellent

Dynamics are consistently accurate enhancing the overall performance. Professional level dynamics.
Breathing Technique

Unacceptable

Breath mechanics are never employed, significantly detracting from the overall performance.
Poor

Breath mechanics are rarely employed, detracting from the overall performance.
Fair

Breath mechanics are often employed, but detract from the overall performance.
Good

Breath mechanics are usually employed, without detracting from the overall performance.
Excellent

Breath mechanics are consistently employed enhancing the overall performance. Professional level technique.
Performance

Unacceptable

Performers do not sing from memory and do not communicate the emotion of the piece significantly detracting from the overall performance.
Poor

Performers occasionally sing from memory and occasionally communicate the emotion of the piece detracting from the overall performance.
Fair

Performers sing from memory, occasionally communicating the emotinal sense of the piece, detracting from the overall performance.
Good

Performers sing from memory, usually communicating the emotional sense of the piece without detracting from the overall performance.
Excellent

Performers sing from memory, communicating the emotional sense of the piece at all times. Professional level performance.
Posture/Allignment

Unacceptable

Student exhibits an unbalanced, rigid, and inflexible posture throught all of the performance.
Poor

Student exhibits an unbalanced, rigid, and inflexible posture throught some of the performance.
Fair

Student exhibits a balanced, free, and flexible posture throught some of the performance. At times posture becomes rigid.
Good

Student exhibits a balanced, free and flexible posture throughout most of the performance.
Excellent

Student exhibits a balanced, free and flexible posture throughout the performance.
Ensemble

Unacceptable

Performers were not able to work together at all. Harmony produced was incorrect. Unable to alternate between performers. No connection between performers.
Poor

Performers were able to work together a bit. Harmony produced was mostly inaccurate. Rarely able to alternate between performers.
Rarely a connection between performers.
Fair

Performers were able to work together some of the time. Harmony produced was mostly accurate. Able to alternate between performers somewhat successfully. Some connection between performers.
Good

Performers worked well together. Harmony produced was accurate. Able to alternate between performers successfully. The connection between the performers was evident.
Excellent

Performers worked exceptionally well together. Harmony produced was extremely good. The connection between the performers was highly evident.




Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16