- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Compare/Contrast Essay rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Compare/Contrast Essay Compare/Contrast Essay S Rubric Code: EXWC572 By lisamtt Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Writing Grade Levels: 6-8

C/C Essay
	Excellent - 4 (N/A)	Good - 3 (N/A)	Fair - 2 (N/A)	Poor - 1 (N/A)
Comparison points	Excellent - 4 There are (3) three clear comparison examples between Paul Revere and Sybil Ludington.	Good - 3 There are (2) two comparison examples between Paul Revere and Sybil Ludington.	Fair - 2 There is (1)one comparison example between Paul Revere and Sybil Ludington.	Poor - 1 Student has not provided any comparison examples between Paul Revere and Sybil Ludington.
Contrasting points	Excellent - 4 The student made a clear contrast between Paul Revere and Sybil Ludington.	Good - 3 The contrast between Paul Revere and Sybil Ludington is somewhat clear.	Fair - 2 The contrast between Paul Revere and Sybil Ludington is not clear.	Poor - 1 Student has not provided any contrast between Paul Revere and Sybil Ludington.
Essay Structure	Excellent - 4 There is cohesion in the essay and all the points make sense. There are no (or very few) grammar mistakes, and they do not take away from the overall essay.	Good - 3 Cohesion is mostly present throughout the essay. There are some grammar mistakes, but they do not take away from the overall essay.	Fair - 2 There are some grammar mistakes, but they do not take away from the overall essay.	Poor - 1 There isn't any real form or format to this essay. Grammar is poor and makes the essay difficult to understand.
Opinion	Excellent - 4 Student clearly identified their opinion about the accuracy of how history is reported and supported it with their thinking and evidence.	Good - 3 Student identified their opinion about the accuracy of how history is reported but did not fully support it with their thinking and/or evidence.	Fair - 2 Student did not clearly identify their opinion about the accuracy of how history is reported and did not fully support it with their thinking and/or evidence.	Poor - 1 Student did not identify their opinion about the accuracy of how history is reported.