Skip to main content
iRubric: Peer Leader Interview rubric

iRubric: Peer Leader Interview rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Peer Leader Interview 
Rubric Code: EX27WX4
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Who will get the job!
  Poor

Will not get the job!

1 pts

Fair

May get the job!

3 pts

Good-Excellent

Will get the job!

5 pts

First Impression

Promptness
Appearance

Poor

*Shows up late
*Does not shake hand
*Clothing is not professional, clothing is dirty or wrinkled
*Poor grooming (too much make-up, jewelry, cologne, etc)
*Chewing gum
*Grooming is distracting (hair, make-up, visable tatoos, piercings, etc)
Fair

*Shows up at time of interview
*Dressed in business casual attire, clothes seemed somewhat wrinkled
Good-Excellent

*Early for interview
*Appearance is professional
*Wearing business attire
*Well groomed (hair, make-up, clothes cleaned and pressed)
*No gum chewing
Greeting

Professionalism
Eye Contact
Communication

Poor

*No greeting
*No handshake
*Little or no eye contact
*Unacceptable behavior
Fair

*Acceptable behavior, lacking professionalism
*Weak handshake
*Introduced self with "Hi" or other inappropriate greeting
*Use of some eye contact
Good-Excellent

*Professional behavior
*Greets interviewer with "Hello", handshake, "thank you."
*Excellent eye contact
Preparation

Knowledgeable
Prepared

Poor

*Knows nothing about the available position or seems to make up information
*Student did not prepare for any of the questions being asked
Fair

*Knows some general information about the available position
*Prepared for some questions
Good-Excellent

*Knowledgeable about the available position and relates skills to the job
*Prepared and practiced interview questions
General Attitude

Interest
Responses

Poor

*Lack of interest and enthusiasm
*Answers "yes" or "no" and fails to elaborate; talks negatively about past employers
*Negative and pessimistic attitude
Doesn't smile
Fair

*Seems interested, but could be more informed on some topics
*Gives well constructed responses, but sounds rehearsed or unsure
*Lacks enthusiasm, rarely smiles
Good-Excellent

*Interested and enthusiastic about the interview
*Gives well constructed, confident responses that are genuine
*Responses demonstrate "good fit" for position
*Smiles often
Poise and Delivery

Posture
Communication
Nervousness
Vocabulary

Poor

*Slouching
*Distracted
*Looking at watch
*Disinterested
*Inappropriate vocabulary;uses slang, street talk, or swears
Fair

*Brief slouching, but quickly corrects self
*Good tone of voice, but answers still hesitant
*Some nervous fidgeting
Good-Excellent

*Good posture
*Nice tone of voice, speaks clearly
*No nervous habits
*Minimal mistakes in sentence structure and grammar
Application

Grammar, content, and completion

Poor

Applicant does not meet qualifications, not regarded as a positive influence on peers.
Fair

Completed and applicant meets all qualifications; minimum 2.75 GPA, sophomore status or greater, able to commit time for office hours.
Good-Excellent

Applicant surpasses qualifications, is known to be very personable, displays positive attitude on campus and has strong communication skills.
Essays

Written responses

Poor

Applicant's answers do not answer the prompt, do not give insight as to why he/she will be a good peer leader.
Fair

Essays meet the less than 500 word count, they answered both, answers to the essays address the topic and exemplify their skills, motivation, resolve, and character.
Good-Excellent

Essay answers are directed to answer the question and exemplify why their experience, skills and strengths will help them be a better peer leader.
References

Poor

1 reference, difficult to reach or does not reply. Reference does not mention any skills applicable to the job.
Fair

2 references that are accessible and give positive feedback and identify skills useful for the job title.
Good-Excellent

2 references, easy to contact via email or in person. The references explain in detail why the candidate would be perfect for the job.










Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98