Skip to main content
iRubric: Research Proposal Presentation rubric

iRubric: Research Proposal Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Research Proposal Presentation 
Research Proposal and Presentation
Rubric Code: CX568A3
By mandyhall
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Psychology  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Proposal Presentation
  Excellent/Exceeds Expectations

5 pts

Good/Meets Expectations

4 pts

Fair/Needs Improvement

3 pts

Poor/Incomplete

1 pts

Introduction

Excellent/Exceeds Expectations

An intriguing introduction that is based on prior research and leads clearly into the research proposal.
Good/Meets Expectations

A fairly well-formulated introduction with some evidence to support the topic and leads into the research proposal.
Fair/Needs Improvement

Introduction is not well constructed, uninteresting, or does not lead into the research proposal.
Poor/Incomplete

Lacks a proper introduction.
Literature Review

Excellent/Exceeds Expectations

Demonstrated basic knowledge of literature in the area, and of prior work on the specific research problem. Mentioned at least 1 theory.
Good/Meets Expectations

Demonstrated basic knowledge of literature or previous research in the area, but did not mention any theories.
Fair/Needs Improvement

Unclearly mentioned some previous work in the area.
Poor/Incomplete

Did not mention any previous research, literature, or theories.
Problem Statement/"Gap"

Excellent/Exceeds Expectations

Stated the research
problem clearly, and provided motivation for undertaking the
research.  
Good/Meets Expectations

Fairly well-posed statement of the problem that provides motivation, but the motivation is not as strong as it could be.
Fair/Needs Improvement

Statement of the problem is not clearly stated and/or lacks quality evidence to support the problem.
Poor/Incomplete

Lacks a proper statement of the problem or motivation presented does not support the thesis or problem statement.
Purpose of Study

Excellent/Exceeds Expectations

Very clearly stated purpose of the study and demonstrated its potential value.
Good/Meets Expectations

Fairly well stated purpose of the study but did not demonstrate its potential value.
Fair/Needs Improvement

Purpose of the study is not clearly stated and/or the value is not stated.
Poor/Incomplete

Lacks a purpose of the study statement.
Proposed Method

Excellent/Exceeds Expectations

Very clearly stated methodology, including population being tested, examples of materials, and procedural details. Easy to follow and is obviously connected to the research purpose.
Good/Meets Expectations

Fairly clearly stated methodology, including population being tested, examples of materials, and procedural details. Fairly easy to follow and is somewhat clearly connected to the research purpose.
Fair/Needs Improvement

Stated methodology was confusing OR did not include one or more of the following elements: population being tested, examples of materials, and procedural details. Connection to the research purpose was vague.
Poor/Incomplete

Stated methodology was confusing AND did not include one or more of the following elements: population being tested, examples of materials, and procedural details. Difficult to follow and connection to the research purpose was non-existent.
Hypotheses/Predicted Results

Excellent/Exceeds Expectations

Well-stated research hypothesis based on the purpose of the study. Connection between predicted results and theories is very clear.
Good/Meets Expectations

Fairly well stated hypothesis based on the purpose of the study. Connection between predicted results and theories is fairly clear.
Fair/Needs Improvement

Stated hypothesis is unclear based on the purpose of the study. Connection between predicted results and theories is vague or lacks clarity.
Poor/Incomplete

Lacks a hypothesis. Connection between predicted results and theories is non-existent.
Presentation Skill

Excellent/Exceeds Expectations

Excellent eye contact, no
distracting gestures,
appropriate volume, clear and consistent
enunciation.
Good/Meets Expectations

Good eye contact, no distracting gestures, usually had appropriate volume, overall clear enunciation.
Fair/Needs Improvement

Inconsistent with eye contact, volume, and enunciation. Obvious distracting mannerism(s).
Poor/Incomplete

Poor eye contact,
volume too low or loud,
poor enunciation.
Visual Aids

Excellent/Exceeds Expectations

The presentation included appropriate and easily understood visual aids that complemented and enhanced the presented information. Included a properly formatted list of references.
Good/Meets Expectations

The presentation included appropriate and easily understood visual aids that somewhat complemented and enhanced the presented information. Included a list of references that was mostly properly formatted.
Fair/Needs Improvement

The presentation included appropriate visual aids, but there were too few, they were difficult to understand, or the presenter did not
refer to or explain them. Included a list of references that was not properly formatted.
Poor/Incomplete

The presentation included no visual aids or the visual aids did not complement the information. Did not include a list of references.
Time Management and Q & A

Excellent/Exceeds Expectations

The presenter made excellent use of his/her presentation time. Answered questions very clearly and knowledgeably.
Good/Meets Expectations

The presenter made good use of his/her presentation time. Answered questions fairly clearly and knowledgeably.
Fair/Needs Improvement

The presenter made acceptable use of his/her presentation time. Answers to questions lacked clarity and/or mastery of topic.
Poor/Incomplete

The presentation was not timed appropriately. Answers to questions were unclear and/or did not demonstrate sufficient knowledge of field.
Creativity and Innovation

Excellent/Exceeds Expectations

Reflected great creativity and uniqueness of thought.
Good/Meets Expectations

Reflected some creativity and uniqueness of thought.
Fair/Needs Improvement

Reflected some creativity OR uniqueness of thought.
Poor/Incomplete

Reflected no creativity or uniqueness of thought.



Keywords:
  • research proposal



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16