iRubric: Multimedia Presentation rubric

Content is clear and concise with a logical sequence of ideas and supporting information.
The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
Information is accurate and current.

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose.
Includes few facts. Some of the information may not seem to fit.
Sources used appear unreliable.

Sequencing of ideas is unclear.
Includes little information - only one or two facts about the topic.
Information is incomplete, out of date and/or incorrect.

You have included more than 10 meaningful pictures/illustrations to support your research information. Photo credits included.
Images are proper size and resolution, and all images enhance the content. The visuals are informative, not merely decorative.

You have included less than 10 pictures/illustrations to support your research information. Graphics are relevant. Photo credits included.
Most images are proper size, resolution. Visuals are used mostly for information, but some are filler.

You have included less than 5 pictures/illustrations to support your research information. Graphics may lack relevance. Photo credits not included.
Graphics/sounds do not enhance understanding of the content, or are distracting decorations that create a busy feeling and detract from the content.
Images are too large/small in size, poorly cropped or color/resolution is fuzzy.

Poised, clear articulation; proper volume; steady rate; good posture and eye contact; enthusiasm; confidence. Did not read from slides.
Involved the audience in the presentation; points made in creative way; held the audience's attention throughout.
Stayed within time limit. Shows a full understanding of the research topic.

Presentation not as polished. Some mumbling; some eye contact; uneven rate; little expression.
Presented facts with some interesting "twists"; held the audience's attention most of the time.
Time OK. At least half of presentation was read from slides. Shows a good understanding of topic.

Inaudible or too loud; no eye contact; rate too slow/fast; speaker seemed uninterested and used monotone.
Some related facts but went off topic and lost the audience; mostly presented facts with little or no imagination.
Too long or too short. Entire presentation was read from slides. Shows little to no learning of topic.