No main idea, purpose, or central theme exists; reader must infer this based on sketchy or missing details
1 pts
Main idea is missing, though possible topic/theme is emerging
2 pts
Main idea is present; may be broad or simplistic
3 pts
Topic or theme is identified as main idea; development remains basic or general
4 pts
Main idea is well-marked by detail but could benefit from additional information
5 pts
Main idea is clear, supported, & enriched by relevant anecdotes & details
6 pts
Organization can't be identified; writing lacks sense of direction; content is strung together in loose, random fashion
Organization is mostly ineffective; only moments here and there direct reader
Organization problematic though has some structure; ability to follow text is slowed
Organization moves reader through text without too much confusion
Organization is smooth in most places
Organization enhances and showcases central idea; order of information is compelling, moving reader through text
Author seems indifferent, uninvolved, or distanced from topic, purpose, &/or audience
Author relies on reader's good faith to hear or feel any voice in phrases such as "I like it" or "It was fun"
Author's voice is hard to recognize, even if reader is trying to "hear" it
Author seems sincere, yet not fully engaged or involved; result is pleasant or personable, though topic & purpose are still not compelling
Author addresses topic, purpose & audience in sincere & engaging way, with few exceptions
Author speaks directly to reader in individual, compelling, & engaging way that delivers purpose & topic; although passionate, author is respectful of audience & purpose
Vocabulary is limited; author searches for words to convey meaning; no mental imagery exists
Vocabulary is flawed, resulting in unclear meaning; wrong words are used; reader can't picture message or content
Vocabulary is understandable yet lacks energy; some interpretation is needed to understand parts of piece
Vocabulary is functional yet lacks energy; author's meaning is easy to understand in general
Vocabulary is precise & appropriate; mental imagery emerges
Vocabulary is powerful & engaging, creating mental imagery; words convey intended message in precise, interesting & natural way
Sentences are incorrectly structured; reader has to practice to give paper a fair interpretive reading; nearly impossible to read aloud
Sentences vary little; even easy sentence structures cause reader to stop and decide what is being said & how; challenging to read aloud
Sentences technically correct but not varied, creating sing-song pattern or lulling reader to sleep; sounds mechanical when read aloud
Sentences are varied; tend to be pleasant or businesslike though may still be more mechanical than musical or fluid; easy to read aloud
Some sentences are rhythmic & flowing; a variety of sentence types are structured correctly; flows well when read aloud
Sentences have flow, rhythm & cadence; well built with strong, varied structure that invites expressive oral reading
Errors in conventions are the norm & repeatedly distract reader, making text unreadable
Many errors of various types of conventions are scattered throughout text
Author continues to stumble in conventions even on simple tasks & almost always on more complex ones
Author has reasonable control over standard conventions for grade level; conventions are sometimes handled well; at other times, errors distract reader
Author stretches, trying more complex tasks in conventions; mistakes still exist; all basic conventions to grade level have been mastered
Author uses standard writing conventions effectively to enhance readability; errors are few and only minor editing is needed to publish