Skip to main content
iRubric: Team Presentation Evaluation Form rubric

iRubric: Team Presentation Evaluation Form rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Team Presentation Evaluation Form 
Rubric Code: BX45X7
By bnixon
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Communication  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Team Presentation Evaluation Form
Enter rubric description
  Excellent

48 pts

Good

43 pts

Average

38 pts

Poor

0 pts

Organization
20 %

Excellent

Consistently clear, concise, well organized. Points were easy to follow because of the organization. Transitions between sections & speakers smooth and coordinated.
Good

Consistently clear,
concise, well organized. Points were easy to follow
because of the organization. Transitions between sections & speakers
smooth and oordinated.
Average

Not always clear or
concise. Organization was adequate, but weak. Occasionally wandered and was sometimes difficult to follow. Transitions between sections & speakers weak.
Poor

Often unclear and
disorganized, rambled too much. The presentation was
confusing and difficult to follow. Transitions between sections & speakers awkward.
Topic Knowledge
20 %

Excellent

Displayed an excellent grasp of the material. Demonstrated excellent mastery of content, application and implications.
Excellent research depth
Good

Displayed a general
grasp of the material.
Demonstrated good mastery of content, application and implications. Good research depth.
Average

Displayed some grasp
of the material.
Demonstrated adequate mastery of content, application and implications.
Research not very deep.
Poor

Displayed a poor grasp of the material.
Demonstrated a superficial handling of content, application and implications. Little depth of research.
Visual Aids & Handouts
15 %

Excellent

Simple, clear, easy to
interpret, easy to read. Well coordinated with content, well designed, used very
effectively. Excellent
example of how to prepare and use good visual aids
Good

Usually clear, easy to
interpret, easy to read. Generally well coordinated with content, design was
okay, generally used
effectively. Demonstrated
some understanding of how to use visual aids.
Average

Marginally acceptable,
too complex, crowded, difficult to read or interpret.
Adequate coordination with
content. Used only
adequately. Showed little
understanding of how to
prepare and use visual aids.
Poor

Poor quality visual aids (or none), hard to read, technically inaccurate, poorly
constructed. Poor
coordination with content. Used poorly. The presenter did not seem to know how to
prepare or use visual aids effectively.
Creativity
10 %

Excellent

Very creative and
original. Imaginative design and use of materials. Novel
handouts, visual aids, or methods.
Good

Exhibited some
originality and creativity.
Average

Routine treatment,
minimal thought given to originality or creativity.
Poor

Lacked creativity. Very ordinary and mundane.
Summary
15 %

Excellent

Clear, concise, major
points emphasized, clear recommendations, strong conclusion or call for action.
Good

Referred to main points, recommendations weak or missing, weak conclusion or
call for action.
Average

Vague mention of major points, no recommendations,
weak conclusion, weak or no call for action.
Poor

No summary, no
recommendations, no
conclusions, no call for action.

"That's it."
"Choreography" of Team
20 %

Excellent

Excellent stage
presence. Confident, used notes well, at ease, excellent gestures, good audience attention, good eye contact. Smooth transitions between speakers in every case.
Good

Good stage presence.
Fairly confident, used notes fairly well, good gestures,
acceptable audience
attention and eye contact. Mostly smooth transitions between speakers.
Average

Adequate stage
presence. Read parts,
fumbled with notes, several distracting mannerisms, minimal gestures, minimal
eye contact, too many ums. Awkward transitions between speakers.
Poor

Poor stage presence.
Unprepared, awkward, shuffled papers, poor eye
contact, lots of ums, turned from audience to read screens, shuffled feet, fidgeted. Poor gestures & transitions between speakers.




Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16