Skip to main content
iRubric: Personal Theory of Counseling Paper rubric

iRubric: Personal Theory of Counseling Paper rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Personal Theory of Counseling Paper 
Personal Theory of Counseling Paper
Use this rubric for grading class assignments. Can be customized for any subject.
Rubric Code: ZXW59B3
By TFlorio
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Psychology  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Criterion
  Beginning

10 pts

Approaching

15 pts

Meeting

20 pts

Exceeding

25 pts

The Nature of People

Beginning

-Content is incomplete.
- Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.
- Questions were not adequately answered.
Approaching

- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
- Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Meeting

- Content is accurate and persuasive.
- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Exceeding

- Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive.
- Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.
- Responses are excellent, timely and address assignment including course concepts.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
The Nature of Problems

Beginning

-Content is incomplete.
- Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.
- Questions were not adequately answered.
Approaching

- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
- Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Meeting

- Content is accurate and persuasive.
- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Exceeding

- Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive.
- Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.
- Responses are excellent, timely and address assignment including course concepts.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Process of Change

Beginning

-Content is incomplete.
- Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.
- Questions were not adequately answered.
Approaching

- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
- Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Meeting

- Content is accurate and persuasive.
- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Exceeding

- Content is accurate and persuasive.
- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
My Theory in Practice

Beginning

-Content is incomplete.
- Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.
- Questions were not adequately answered.
Approaching

- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
- Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Meeting

- Content is accurate and persuasive.
- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Exceeding

- Content is accurate and persuasive.
- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Multicultural Considerations

Beginning

-Content is incomplete.
- Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.
- Questions were not adequately answered.
Approaching

- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
- Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Meeting

- Content is accurate and persuasive.
- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Exceeding

- Content is accurate and persuasive.
- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Strengths and Limitations

Beginning

-Content is incomplete.
- Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.
- Questions were not adequately answered.
Approaching

- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
- Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Meeting

- Content is accurate and persuasive.
- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Exceeding

- Content is accurate and persuasive.
- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Enter Title
  Enter Title

25 pts

Enter Title

30 pts

Enter Title

35 pts

Enter Title

40 pts

APA Style & Appropriate Sources

Enter Title

-APA style is not used
- sources are not cited and/or referenced
- sources are not scholarly or inadequate
Enter Title

-Some APA formatting used
- some sources cited & referenced correctly
- some sources appropriate
Enter Title

- Attempt to use APA format throughout is clear
- sources mostly cited and refernced correctly
-sources are adequate and appropriate
Enter Title

- APA style used almost perfectly
- citations and references all correctly formatted
- sources go above minimum and are used in sophisticated ways
Enter Title
  Enter Title

4 pts

Enter Title

6 pts

Enter Title

8 pts

Enter Title

10 pts

Coherence & Analyses

Enter Title

- Assignment lacks many elements of correct formatting.
- Assignment is inadequate in length/depth of thought.
-- Analyses
are not included.
Enter Title

- Assignment follows most guidelines.
-- Insufficient analyses are included.
-Analyses do not adequately address the questions posed.
-Analyses are not well organized or clear.
Enter Title

- Assignment follows designated guidelines.
- Assignement is the appropriate length.
-Format is good.
-Analyses are sufficient in number but may not be well organized or as clear as they could be.
posed.
Enter Title

- Assignment follows all designated guidelines.
- Assignment is the appropriate length/depth of thought.
-Format enhances readability of work.
-Analyses are organized logically, clearly presented, titled properly, easy to understand by a lay reader, and directly address the questions posed






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16