- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Diorama Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Diorama Rubric Diorama Rubric Work with primary sources to make a diorama that shows what Kelowna would have looked like 100 years ago. You need a minimum of ONE structure, TWO different geographic features, and THREE different technologies. I would also encourage you to explore the diversity of Kelowna at the time (Ex. KUO MIN TANG building in Kelowna’s Chinatown). Bonus: Make OKAA’s original school. Rubric Code: ZX872A5 By jwirtz Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Social Sciences Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12

Diorama Rubric
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Acceptable 3 pts	Great 4 pts	Excellent 5 pts
Appearance of Project & Creativity	Poor The project's appearance is quite poor. Many distractive elements.	Fair The project's appearance is somewhat poor. Some distracting elements.	Acceptable The project's appearance is good with mostly positive elements.	Great The project's appearance is quite professional and polished with few distracting elements.	Excellent The project's appearance is professional and polished without distractive elements.
Accuracy	Poor The project content poor and suggests the student has not done sufficient research.	Fair The project content is fair/poor and suggests the student has not discovered most of the important ideas presented.	Acceptable The project content is good (specific details, geography, technologies) and suggests the student has understood most of the important main ideas presented.	Great The project content is great and suggests the student has understood the major ideas presented.	Excellent The project content is exemplary (specific details, geography, technologies) and suggests the student has fully understood the important ideas of the scene presented.
Images and Models	Poor Too few images or models are used to be an effective presentation.	Fair Some images or models are effective.	Acceptable Most of the images or models are effective.	Great All or almost all of the images or models are effective; there may be too few or too many.	Excellent All images or models are effective.
Sources	Poor Has little to no credible sources to validate their information.	Fair Lacks a few sources or does not have credible sources.	Acceptable Is missing some sources or does not have all credible source.	Great Has just enough credible resources to validate their information.	Excellent Has more than enough credible resources to validate their information, including primary sources.