Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Final Paper rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Final Paper
APA College Research Paper
Research a complex persuasive campaign using primary and secondary sources to support your arguments. Submit a 10-15 page paper, double spaced, 12 point font following APA guidelines, including a bibliography citing at least three theories from the text(s) used to evaluate the campaign. Paper will be graded on quality and credibility of research, effective use of applying the theories to the "text," the quality of writing style, grammar/mechanics, and proper formatting.
Rubric Code:
ZX697A8
By
cvanhorn
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Communication
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Research Paper
Excellent
(N/A)
Good
(N/A)
Needs Improvement
(N/A)
Unsatisfactory
(N/A)
Quality of research
120 pts
Excellent
--Cited 3 or more valid theories.
--Sufficient information provided to support all elements of topic..
--Research in-depth and beyond the obvious, revealing new insights gained.
--Provided a minimum of 10 outside sources to back up points.
Good
--Cited 3 theories.
--Sources mostly reliable.
--Sufficient information provided to support thesis.
--Research of sufficient depth.
--Provided a minimum of 8 outside sources to back up points.
Needs Improvement
-- Cited 2 theories.
--Source reliability questionable or not considered scholarly in nature.
--Some information relevant to thesis
--Surface research.
--Provided a minimum of 6 outside sources to back up points.
Unsatisfactory
--Failed to cite at least 2 sources.
--Sources unreliable.
--Irrelevant to thesis and does not support the topic.
--Surface research.
--Provided 5 or fewer outside sources to back up points.
Content
120 pts
Excellent
--Clear thesis--problem is clearly identified.
--Framework used to analyze the problem is clear and complex.
--Arguments are pertinent to the topic.
--Arguments are logical, supported with evidence.
--Support for thesis complex, complete, & in-depth.
-- Use of 10 or more in text citations to support thesis.
--Writer involved with subject, not merely doing an assignment.
--Clear organization, with effective transitions
Good
--Thesis is somewhat clear
--Framework is somewhat clear
--Arguments are pertinent to the topic.
--Arguments are fairly logical and reasonably supported.
-Support for thesis sufficient, but lacking in depth or complexity.
-- Less then 10 in text citations are used to support the thesis.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness
Needs Improvement
--Thesis lacks clarity
--Framework is not clear and/or complex
--Arguments are not consistently pertinent.
--Few key arguments are made.
--Support for thesis is thin.
-- Fewer than 10 in text citations used to support thesis.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Unsatisfactory
--Thesis is very weak
--Framework is lacking
--Arguments are not pertinent.
--Arguments, if at all, are not logical or supported.
--Support for thesis insufficient.
--Fewer than 8 in text citations used to support thesis
--No organization, transitions, introduction, and no conclusion
Grammar and Mechanics
80 pts
Excellent
--Consistent and appropriate voice.
-- Sophisticated and precise word choice.
--No spelling errors.
--No errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- No punctuation or capitalization errors.<BR>
--Met all style and min/max page requirements
Good
-- Voice mostly consistent and appropriate.
-- Fairly effective word choice.
--No more than 2 spelling errors.
--Fewer than 1 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- Fewer than 2 punctuation or capitalization errors.
--Met most style and min/max page requirements
Needs Improvement
-- Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate.
-- Correct word choice.
--More than 3 spelling errors.
--More than 2 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- More than 3 punctuation or capitalization errors.
Attempted to meet style and/or min/max page requirements
Unsatisfactory
-- Voice inconsistent and inappropriate.
-- Incorrect word choices.
--More than 5 spelling errors.
--More than 5 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- More than 5 punctuation or capitalization errors.
Does not meet style and/or min/max page requirements
Format
40 pts
Excellent
--All sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
--Contains compelling, clear subtitles and resources page.
Good
--All sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-Contains clear and concise subtitles, and resources page.
Needs Improvement
--Not all sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography but includes subtitles, and resources page.
Unsatisfactory
--Most sources are not properly cited in the paper and bibliography.
--Missing subtitles, and resources page.
Interest
40 pts
Excellent
--There is nuance, inference and subtlety to the paper.
--Main points are memorable.
--Reader is very engaged.
Good
--There is little nuance, inference or subtlety.
--Main points are clear.
--Reader is engaged.
Needs Improvement
--Nuance, inference and subtlety lacking.
--Main points present, but not well made.
--Reader is not engaged.
Unsatisfactory
--Analysis and synthesis lacking.
--Main points not discernible.
--Reader is frustrated.
Keywords:
Research paper - emphasis on relevance of research
Subjects:
Communication
English
Education
Types:
Presentation
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Communication rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.