Skip to main content
iRubric: Highland High rubric

iRubric: Highland High rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
2016-2017 Stuco Interviews
Rubric Code: YX82W9B
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Highland High
Students Council Executive Interviews
  Excellent

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Total

4 pts

Comment/Notes

0 pts

First Impressions

Excellent

It is obvious that the Candidate has put time and thought into his or her answers.
Good

The candidate has put some time and thought into his or her answers.
Fair

It seems as though the candidate has put close to no time or thought into his or her answers.
Poor

The candidate has put no time and thought into his or her answers.
Total
Comment/Notes
Position

Excellent

Candidate knows the responsibilities associated with the position and clearly understands the commitment and responsibility needed.
Good

Candidates knows some about the position, commitment and responsibility needed.
Fair

Candidate knows little about the position and does not understand the commitment or responsibility needed.
Poor

Candidate knows nothing about the position and clearly does not understand the commitment or responsibility needed.
Total
Comment/Notes
Preparation

Excellent

Candidate was definitely prepared to present his/her presentation and answer questions from the panel.
Good

Candidate seemed mostly prepared to present and answer questions from the panel.
Fair

Candidate seemed barely prepared to present and answer the questions from the panel.
Poor

Candidate was not prepared to present or answer the questions from the panel.
Total
Comment/Notes
General Attitudes

Excellent

Candidate is energetic and is genuinely interested in the position.
Good

Candidate is passive and seems interested or is overly enthusiastic of the position.
Fair

Candidate is neutral and shows little enthusiasm in the position.
Poor

Candidate shows a lack of interest in the position.
Total
Comment/Notes
Response

Excellent

The candidate is very knowledgeable in the responsibilities of a Student Council member. He or she demonstrates full knowledge by answering all questions with explanations and elaboration
Good

The candidate is somewhat knowledgeable in the responsibilities of a Student Council member. He or she demonstrates little knowledge by answering the questions with some explanations.
Fair

The candidate has little knowledge in the responsibilities of a Student Council member. He or she does not provide explanations.
Poor

Candidate seems to have no knowledge in the responsibilities of a Student Council member.
Total
Comment/Notes
Leadership Experience

Excellent

Applicant has exceeded expectations for leadership experience.
Good

Applicant has met the standards for leadership experience.
Fair

Student has not fully met the standard for leadership experience, however they are still considerable.
Poor

Student has no prior leadership experience.
Total
Comment/Notes
Quality

Excellent

Candidate's presentation and answers reflect outstanding professional depth and quality. Candidate will be a strong voice and leader for his or her position.
Good

Candidate's presentation an answers reflect adequate professional depth and quality. Candidate will most likely be a strong voice and leader for his or her position.
Fair

Candidate's presentation and answers reflect average depth and quality. Candidate will not likely be a strong voice and leader for his or her position.
Poor

Candidate's presentation and answers did not reflect depth or quality. Candidate will not be a strong voice or leader for his or her position.
Total
Comment/Notes
Council Experience

Excellent

Candidate has served 2-3 full years prior in the Student Council
Good

Student has served 1 full year in the council prior to the interview
Fair

Student has served less than one year in the council.
Poor

Student has no prior experience in the council.
Total
Comment/Notes
Appearance

Excellent

Candidate's dress was appropriate and professional that exceeded standards.
Good

Candidate's dress was appropriate for the interview that was semi formal
Fair

Dress was nicer than casual but not completely formal attire.
Poor

The candidate's attire did not meet a formal standard.
Total
Comment/Notes
Teacher Recommendations

Excellent

The applicant has 2 teachers that fully recommend his or her running for office.
Good

The applicant has 1 teacher that recommend his or her running for office.
Fair

The applicant has 1-2 teacher reviews that are partially recommending the applicant.
Poor

The applicant received no teacher recommendations or the teachers did not support the candidate's running for office.
Total
Comment/Notes
Overall

Excellent

Candidate would be an essential component to Student Council.
Good

Candidate would make a good student council executive.
Fair

Candidate would be a fair student council executive.
Poor

Candidate would be detrimental to the effectiveness of Student Council.
Total

Grand Total
Comment/Notes



Keywords:
  • Student Council Interview

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16