Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: VEX Group Robotics Rubric (Forman)
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
VEX Group Robotics Rubric (Forman)
VEX Robot Design
This rubric will be used to assess the overall design of group of students' robot that is going to be built with VEX Robotics parts. This does not include the sketch or CAD drawing of the robot. This deals with group functionality and project management as pertains to the design of the group's project.
Rubric Code:
XX7BB33
By
cbass44
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Vocational
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Robot Design Rubric
Expert
3 pts
Proficient
2 pts
Emerging
1 pts
Group Dynamics
Expert
Group follows good meeting and teamwork procedures. Discussion remains professional in tone and direction. Discussion proceeds efficiently. Group is able to focus on the relevant aspects of the robot.
Proficient
Group follows decent meeting and teamwork procedures. Discussion remains professional in tone and direction. For the most part discussion proceeds efficiently. For the most part group focuses on relevant aspect of robot designs.
Emerging
Group follows few meeting and teamwork procedures. Discussion does not have a professional tone or manner. Discussion does not proceed efficiently. Group rarely focuses on relevant aspects of robot design.
Decision Making
Expert
Group members avoid unnecessary “attachment” to their designs that gets in the way of productive discussion. All group member are able to reach consensus.
Proficient
Group members avoid unnecessary “attachment” to their designs that gets in the way of productive discussion. Most group members are able to reach a consensus.
Emerging
Group members must keep pieces of their original design which may temporarily halt productive discussion. Few group members reach consensus.
Project Management
Expert
Development is in line with timeline submitted in Engineering Notebook. Group member roles and responsibilities are defined and adhered to. Schedule for future re-design is practical and workable.
Proficient
Development is mostly in line with timeline submitted in Engineering Notebook. Group members have roles and responsibilities which were mostly adhered to. Schedule for future re-design is present and likely practical and workable.
Emerging
Group members do not abide by timeline that was submitted in Engineering Notebook. Group members do not adhere to clearly defined set of roles and responsibilities. Future re-design is present but may not be in schedule or practical and workable.
Project Progress
Expert
Project shows a clear progression beyond the ideation written in Engineering Notebook. Every team member has effectively contributed to development. Decisions show evidence of a thoughtful decision-making process. Group has given appropriate consideration to all aspects of development, including mechanics, programming, and testing.
Proficient
Project has progressed beyond the ideation written in Engineering Notebook. Most team members have effectively contributed to development. Most decisions show evidence of a thoughtful decision-making process. Group has spent some time considering all aspects of development.
Emerging
Project has made only fair progression beyond the ideation written in Engineering Notebook. Few team members have effectively contributed to development. Decisions were made without using a decision-making process. Group has spent little time considering all aspects of development.
Future Plans
Expert
Group can describe what aspects of design will be worked on next. Group has prioritized remaining tasks to ensure project will be completed on time.
Proficient
Group can give a general idea of what future aspects of design will look like. Group has prioritized the ideas they have come up with for future design.
Emerging
Group have very little idea about future aspects of design. Group has no timeline to get future tasks done.
Subjects:
Vocational
Types:
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Vocational rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.