Skip to main content
iRubric: Literary Argument Rubric

iRubric: Literary Argument Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Literary Argument Rubric 
Literary Analysis Rubric
Rubric to assess students' ability to construct a critical analysis that uses textual evidence to defend an argument.
Rubric Code: XX599A6
By sandrewssomsd
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Criteria
  Non existent

0 pts

Inconsistant

1 pts

Good

2 pts

Very Good / Excellent

3 pts

Central Claim

Non existent

Central claim is missing.
Inconsistant

Central claim is basic/limited with little precision.
Good

Central claim demonstrates a clear understanding of the task.
Very Good / Excellent

Central claim is insightful and well-developed. Position is arguable and demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the task.
Introduction

Includes book title and author, thesis statement and attention grabber.
Non existent

Introduction not clear or missing.
Inconsistant

Introduction does not include a thesis statement or thesis strands.
Good

Introduction includes a thesis statement and thesis strands.
Very Good / Excellent

Has a clear introduction, thesis statements and thesis strands that relate to the body paragraphs and conclusion.
Background and body paragraphs

Topic sentences and textual evidence.
Non existent

No background provided.
Body paragraphs missing or do not include evidence to support claim.
Inconsistant

A somewhat clear background is provided.
Body paragraphs do not relate to the thesis statement and thesis strands. Body paragraphs are not clear.
Good

A background is provided that is relevant to the topic.
Body paragraphs relate to the thesis strands, although they may not include topic sentences or a clear argument.
Very Good / Excellent

A clear and thorough background is provided.
Body paragraphs have topic sentences that relate to the thesis strands and run-on logically. Argument is clear and thorough in the body paragraphs.
Conclusion

Wraps up paper, evidence and thesis statement.
Non existent

Conclusion missing or does not relate to the paper.
Inconsistant

Main points are not restated in the conclusion clearly and there is no connection back to the introduction.
Good

The main points are restated clearly but not in a new way. There is a connection back to the introduction but it needs to be clearer.
Very Good / Excellent

The main points are restated clearly and in a new way. There is a clear connection back to the introduction.
Textual Evidence

Includes quotes from the book.
Non existent

Evidence missing.
Inconsistant

Evidence is not specific. Writer does not include at least three pieces of textual evidence. Evidence is simple and not fully explored. Evidence does not support the writer's argument/thesis.
Good

Includes at least three textual references to back up thesis, but they are not thoroughly explained or examined. Evidence is not specific and/or does not support the writer's argument/thesis statement.
Very Good / Excellent

Includes at least three textual references to back up thesis. This evidence is specific and thoroughly examined. Evidence is quoted or paraphrased and clearly supports the writer's argument.
Opposing claim

Non existent

Rebuttal is missing.
Inconsistant

Opposing claim is not clear. The rebuttal is not in the appropriate part of the essay.
Good

Opposing claim is mentioned. It and goes against the thesis. The rebuttal is mentioned after the last body paragraph and before the conclusion.
Very Good / Excellent

Opposing claim is strong. It is clearly stated and goes against the thesis. The rebuttal is mentioned after the last body paragraph and before the conclusion.
Mechanics/Style

Spelling/grammar/capitalization.
Non existent

There are numerous errors, which makes the essay difficult to understand. Student has not maintained a formal style.
Inconsistant

The submission clearly has not been edited. There are numerous spelling, punctuation errors, and sentence structure problems. Student uses contractions throughout paper.
Good

There are few spelling errors. Student uses mostly proper grammar, including correct punctuation and sentence structure in most cases. Student uses a few contractions.
Very Good / Excellent

Uses correct grammar, including spelling, punctuation and sentence structure. Sentences are complete. Student uses capitalization where needed. Student avoids using contractions. Work has been edited.
Work Cited/MLA format

Work cited page, MLA format, and rough draft attached.
Non existent

Missing all components.
Inconsistant

Does not include any of the components.
Good

Includes some of the components.
Very Good / Excellent

Includes all components.
Work cited page is attached (sources are in alphabetical order), MLA format is followed, and the rough draft is attached (or in the Drive).



Keywords:
  • Critical, Analysis, Textual Evidence, Argument


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16