- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Topic Curation rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Topic Curation Rubric Code: XA5AB4 By atrepeta Draft Public Rubric Subject: Communication Type: Project Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Criteria
	Excellent 20 pts	Good 15 pts	Fair 10 pts	Poor 5 pts
Selection Process	Excellent At least five curated resources are significant and relevant to topic and audience. All content has been verified as true.	Good Most curated resources are significant and relevant to topic and audience. All content has been verified as true.	Fair Few curated resources are significant and relevant to topic and audience. Some or all content has not been verified.	Poor Fewer than five resources used and most or all are not significant and relevant to topic and audience. Some or all content has not been verified
Editorial Process	Excellent All content is contextualized with introduction and summary. You have added your own perspective.	Good Most content is contextualized with introduction and summary. You have added your own perspective.	Fair Little content is contextualized with introduction and summary. Little or no perspective is provided.	Poor Content is not contextualized. Little or no perspective is provided.
Arrangement	Excellent All content is appropriately sorted and ranked. You have paid attention to juxtaposition.	Good Most content is appropriately sorted and ranked. You have paid attention to juxtaposition.	Fair Little content is appropriately sorted and ranked. You have not paid attention to juxtaposition.	Poor Content is not appropriately sorted and ranked. You have not paid attention to juxtaposition.
Creation Process	Excellent Engaging introduction to your collection is included in the description. Professional looking end product that credits each source.	Good Acceptable introduction to your collection is included in the description. Acceptable appearance of end product that credits each source.	Fair Poor introduction to your collection is included in the description. End product credits most or all sources.	Poor No introduction to your collection is included in the description. Most or all sources are not credited in the end product.
Level of Engagement	Excellent Content collection attracts a large audience & number of comments.	Good Content collection attracts a some audience & comments.	Fair Content collection attracts little audience & few comments.	Poor Content collection attracts very little or no audience & comments.