Skip to main content
iRubric: Web 2.0 Tool Rubric

iRubric: Web 2.0 Tool Rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Web 2.0 Tool Rubric 
Rubric Code: WX88767
By k8mstep
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Web Tool Rubric
 

1 pts


2 pts


3 pts


4 pts

Connection to Curriculum

1

There is no alignment with expected curriculum outcomes or standards. Content is questionable, and platform does not allow differentiation.
2

There is minimal alignment to curriculum. Allows rote skill practice, with few options for differentiation.
3

Mostly aligns with curriculum and desired outcomes. Some differentiation is available. Content is accurate and appropriately presented.
4

App directly aligns with desired curriculum outcomes. Allows differentiation for best support of all students. Content is accurate and appropriately presented.
User Friendliness

1

Students will need a teacher supervising them at all times while using the tool. The tool is well designed and includes ONE of the following: tool is easy to navigate, graphics are meaningful and enhance user experience, text is easy to read, and purpose is communicated clearly.
2

Students needs a review of the tool on more than one occasion. The tool is well designed and includes TWO of the following: tool is easy to navigate, graphics are meaningful and enhance user experience, text is easy to read, and purpose is communicated clearly.
3

Students may need a review lesson of how to use the tool. The tool is well designed and includes THREE of the following: tool is easy to navigate, graphics are meaningful and enhance user experience, text is easy to read, and purpose is communicated clearly.
4

Students can work independently within the tool. The tool is well designed and includes all of the following: tool is easy to navigate, graphics are meaningful and enhance user experience, text is easy to read, and purpose is communicated clearly.
Appeal

1

No effort has been made to make this app attractive. Layout is basic and with no attention to color, fonts or graphics. Student interest is low to nonexistent due to lack of appeal and distractions are frequent.
2

Design is minimal with only some or poorly executed use of layout, graphics, color choice and fonts. Some student interest is encouraged but students are often distracted.
3

Attention to design has been made but is missing or lacking one of the following components: layout, graphics, color choice, font selection. Facilitates student interest but with some distractions.
4

Tool is visually appealing and includes engaging graphics, sleek design and layout, attractive fonts and a good use of color. Design motivates student interest and limits distractions.
Feedback

1

This webtool has no form of feedback for students and has no form of reporting for teachers.
2

This web tool’s feedback is limited to the correctness of student response, and/or has minimal reporting to teachers.
3

This web tool provides specific feedback for students or has a form of reporting or tracking for teachers.
4

This web tool provides specific feedback for students as well as has a form of reporting or tracking for teachers.
Relative Advantage

1

The features this tool provide can easily be done with other resources that are more readily available.
2

The tasks completed with this tool can easily be done with multiple other tools, but this one is a little easier to use.
3

This tool is fun and interesting, but other similar web tools can do the same thing better.
4

This tool is superior to others like it and tasks completed with this tool cannot be done with more readily available tools.
Student Engagement

1

Tool has no opportunities for students to interact proactively in the the subject at hand, facilitates only passive, single dimensional learning.
2

Some interaction is supported but tool mainly relies on engaging students through passive learning.
3

Tool enables students to interact with the tool in a way that is active, but variety in options to deepen understanding is limit.
4

Tool offers an interface that encourages students to be active learners while using the tool. There are a variety of options or features that promote student interaction leading to a deeper understanding of a topic or set of information.
Feasibility

1

High cost prohibits wide deployment of application in the classroom, or limited use of app provides no real value.
2

App is inexpensive, and offers little impact on student outcomes.
3

App is inexpensive, yet offers limited return on student performance. App is not easily deployed over existing student platform.
4

Cost is relatively inexpensive or affordable when compared to return on student performance. App is accessible within school server and across filters.
Security and Control

1

The tool has been updated within the 2 years . The tool may not allow for the teacher to have some control of student’s settings within the tool.
2

The tool has been updated within the last 18 months. The tool also allows for the teacher to have very little control of student’s settings within the tool.
3

The tool is updated and has been updated within the year. The tool also allows for the teacher to have some control of student’s settings within the tool.
4

The tool is regularly updated and has been updated within the past six months. The tool also allows for the teacher to monitor student’s settings within the tool.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98