iRubric: Poster and presentation rubric

The work done exceeds all expectations and shows that the group is proud of their work. Includes 5 NEAT illustrations or color pictures. Text is clear, neat and straight

The work was done with good effort that shows what the group is capable of. It is evident that time was put into this poster and presentation. Includes 4 NEAT illustrations or color pictures. Text is clear, neat and straight but too tiny for presentation.

Work is done with fair effort, but the quality is still not what group is capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed. Includes 3 NEAT illustrations or pictures. All images are black and white. Text is to small, messy or crooked.

Work is done with little effort, quality is not what the group is capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed and little time was spent on the final product. Work is incomplete. Includes 0 - 2 illustrations or pictures. All images are black and white. Text is illegible and crooked/messy and tiny.

Poster is of exceptional quality and presentation. Nothing hanging or falling off. Submitted on time.

Poster is correct size, clean and neatly displayed. No items falling off. Submitted on due date.

Poster is damaged, poorly presented. Poster was possibly submitted 1 day later than original due date. Some items possibly falling off.

Not on required poster paper and/or submitted 2 days late. Pieces/items falling or hanging off.

The group’s hypothesis was clear and detailed. Ample supporting evidence was included to support the hypothesis.

The group’s hypothesis was clear. Supporting evidence was included to support the hypothesis.

The group’s hypothesis was clear. No supporting evidence was included to support the hypothesis.

The group’s hypothesis was not clear. No supporting evidence was included to support the hypothesis.

Graphs and data were clearly labeled and displayed. An exceptional number of data points were taken to conserve reliability. All units, axis and measurements were clearly labeled in data table and graphs.

Graphs and data were labeled and displayed. A appropriate number of data points were taken to conserve reliability. All units, axis and measurements were clearly labeled in data table and graphs.

Graphs and data were labeled and displayed poorly. A Inadequate number of data points were taken to conserve reliability. Not all units, axis and measurements were clearly labeled in data table and graphs.

Graphs and data were not labeled and displayed on poster. A Inadequate number of data points were taken to conserve reliability. Units, axis and measurements were not clearly labeled in data table and graphs.

The conclusion written by the group is well written and is appropriate to the data gathered. The answers to questions are clear, insightful, and site credible sources.

The conclusion written by the group is well written and is appropriate to the data gathered. The answers to questions are clear, and site credible sources.

The conclusion written by the group is appropriate to the data gathered. The answers to questions site credible sources.

The conclusion written by the group is not appropriate to the data gathered. The answers to questions do not site credible sources.