Skip to main content
iRubric: Developmental Psychology 325 Class Presentation rubric

iRubric: Developmental Psychology 325 Class Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Developmental Psychology 325 Class Presentation 
Developmental Psychology 325 Class Presentation
Student groups will be responsible for thoroughly presenting/teaching the topic to the class in 20 minute period
Rubric Code: VXX468A
By trimiros
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Psychology  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Dev.Psych. Presentationn
Group Presentation
 

Outstabding

5 pts


Good

4 pts


Fair

3 pts


Poor

2 pts

Subject Knowledge
20 pts

5 ( x 20 pts)

Students have addressed major facts r/t the cognitive ,physical social emotional aspects of dev stage.Info is accurate, ,relevant.Critical thinking evidenced, applications made
4 ( x 20 pts)

Students have addressed many of the cognitive ,physical social emotional aspects of dev stage. Info is relevant and current & certain areas show critical thinking. Appropriate applications made.
3 ( x 20 pts)

Students have included some facts regarding cognitive ,physical social emotional developmental stage assigned however may have missed some main areas or covered them inadequately.
There is some understanding of subject but little critical thought. few applications.
2 ( x 20 pts)

Students have included inadequate facts regarding the cognitive, physical social emotional aspects of the developmental stage assigned.
Information is inaccurate and shows surface knowledge only.
Delivery Methods and Visuals
20 pts

5 ( x 20 pts)

Visual Aids are of superior quality, neat and organized. Variety of style and form is maximized ( art music, color) Visuals effectively aid the listener in understanding the presentation.
4 ( x 20 pts)

Visual aids are of high quality. Visuals somewhat varied. Visuals aid the listener in understanding the presentation.
3 ( x 20 pts)

Visual aids are not high quality. Not easy to read or comprehend, & are not clearly in sync or linked to the presentation . Aids do not aid in the understanding of the presentation.
2 ( x 20 pts)

Presentation lacks visual aids, or they are insufficient. Aids are of poor quality and deter from understanding of the presentation
Comprehensibility of Presentation
20 pts

5 ( x 20 pts)

Well structured and presented in a logical sequence. Into, Purpose etc. Students have rehearsed the presentation and are speaking clearly for everyone to hear.
4 ( x 20 pts)

Well structured and presented in a fairly logical sequence. Into, Purpose etc. identified
some minor confusion evident. members vary in ability to be heard.









Weight: pts





Move row up
Delete row
Move row down



advanced options
Weight: pts





Move row up
Delete row
Move row down <
3 ( x 20 pts)

Somewhat clear but leaves the listener a little lost. Students are not sure of what they are presenting.
2 ( x 20 pts)

Unclear and confusing. Not understood by listeners.
Use and Variety of Sources
15 pts

5 ( x 15 pts)

Sources of high quality ( scholarly original) and varied. 6/6 quality research articles included. Content relevant & smoothly integrated into discussion. All sources are referenced using APA format.
4 ( x 15 pts)

Majority of sources are high quality ( scholarly , original) and varied. 5-6/6 articles included. Content relevant and smoothly integrated into discussion. All sources are referenced using APA format
3 ( x 15 pts)

Little variety and 4 or more of sources are not scholarly or from questionable resources. Content not well understood irrelevant or misapplied. All sources are referenced using APA format
2 ( x 15 pts)

Unreliable and uncorroborated sources. less than Little or no variety. some may be referenced, but inproperly, or non APA style.
Persuasion/ Context
10 pts

5 ( x 10 pts)

Convincingly addresses all areas and accomplishes the purpose of the assignment.
4 ( x 10 pts)

Addresses most areas but leaves certain areas not addressed.
3 ( x 10 pts)

Only some parts of development are addressed.
2 ( x 10 pts)

Unsupported and unconvincing presentation. Purpose of the presentation is not accomplished.
Participation & style
15 pts

5 ( x 15 pts)

all members included and participated fully.
4 ( x 15 pts)

All members participated fully, however one or more appeared ill at ease, or non confident . Poor eye contact, or fidgeting
3 ( x 15 pts)

memebers participated unevenly. One or more appearred nervous and ill prepared, or lacked confidence.
2 ( x 15 pts)

not all members were present. Style was disorganized or select members dominated or did not fully participate



Keywords:
  • Developmental Psychology 325 heritage University Presentation

Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16