Skip to main content
iRubric: Shattered Value Drawing; 7th Grade Project rubric

iRubric: Shattered Value Drawing; 7th Grade Project rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Shattered Value Drawing; 7th Grade Project 
Shattered Value Drawing; 7th Grade Project
Students will create a drawing using 9 different values. They will have a contour drawing that they break into shapes.
Rubric Code: TX68C7A
By Jaycee58
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Shattered Value Drawing
  Level 1

1 pts

Level 2

2 pts

Level 3

3 pts

Level 4

4 pts

Level 5

5 pts

Craftsmanship with value changes.

~Using 9 changes in value
~Smooth blending within each shape.
Level 1

*The student did not try to use value change.
Level 2

*The student attempted to use value, but most of the drawing was gray.
*The blending was not smooth and only a couple value changes were present.
Level 3

*There are 5 different values present in the drawing.
*The blending is choppy and could have been smoothed out.
Level 4

*At least 7 value changes are present and the drawing did a great job expressing the extreme white and very dark areas.
*The blending is pretty smooth, but still has some stripes visible.
Level 5

*The student did an excellent job using all 9 value changes and making certain the light and darks were really evident.
*The blending was outstanding.
Repeated Patterns; composition

~Using a consistent shape or design to develop continuity in your work.
~Overlapping- attention to composition (Rules of composition)
Level 1

*No pattern used.
*Designs do not connect with one another. No overlapping or consideration of composition.
Level 2

*There was a pattern used in only a few areas of the drawing.
*Items were very centered in the composition.
*shatter lines go up to the object but not through it.
Level 3

*A few shapes were repeated.
*Student used the whole picture plane.
*Overlapping was started, but could have been more effective. Shatter lines should go through the objects.
Level 4

*Shapes, direction of lines, and variety was considered.
*Student used the entire picture plane and began to consider composition.
*Nice overlapping of objects. Shatter lines go through objects.
Level 5

*The use of pattern is outstanding. The composition is interesting and fun to look at.
Effort

~Took time to complete the task
Level 1

*The student did not finish the work.
Level 2

*The student did not finish the work in a satisfactory manner.
Level 3

*The student finished the project but it lacked finished touches. The project could be improved upon with little effort.
Level 4

*The student completed the project in an above average manner, yet more could have been done.
Level 5

*The student gave an effort far beyond the requirements of the project.
Creativity/ Originality

~Creative idea, thumbnail sketches used to make a creative piece
~Took time to plan out the composition
Level 1

*The piece shows little or no evidence of original thought.
*There are no preliminary thumbnails or sketches.
Level 2

*The piece shows little evidence of original thought.
*There are minimal attempts at preliminary thumbnails or sketches.
Level 3

*The student's work lacked sincere originality.
*There are attempts at thumbnail sketches but they do not show adequate problem solving efforts.
Level 4

*The student's work demonstrates originality.
*The student has created several sketches or thumbnails in an effort to work through problem solving.
Level 5

*The student's work demonstrates originality.
*Shows evidence of planning and problem solving through complex thumbnails that show the process of thought.
Academic Terms/ Vocabulary

~Craftsmanship
~Composition
~Value change
Level 1

*Paid no attention to the position of the subject matter and the craftsmenship.
Level 2

*The size of objects, placement, and value changes were barely considered and craftsmanship was not a priority.
Level 3

*The size of objects, placement, and value changes were considered. But the placement of values and blending on the shapes needs more work.
Level 4

*The project shows good consideration to the composition of the design and has considered craftsmanship.
Level 5

*The final piece is interesting (visible consideration to the placement of the objects). Compition and craftsmanship were above and beyond the requirement.
Cooperation

~Helpful to your class and listening to instruction.
Level 1

*Student does not show a willingness to complete assigned tasks and help set up and clean up projects.
*Does not work well with others.
*The student is often not in their seat when the bell rings and/ or rushes to finish.
Level 2

*The student is rarely willing to complete assigned tasks and help set up and clean up projects.
*Sometimes works well with others.
*Student is sometimes out of their seat when the bell rings.
*Uses minimum amount of time.
Level 3

*The student is sometimes willing to complete assigned tasks and help set up and clean up projects.
*Students will work with others only if required.
*Student is in seat when the bell rings and uses studio time appropriately.
Level 4

*The student is usually willing to complete assigned tasks and help set up and clean up projects.
*The student works well with others.
*Student is in their seat when the bell rings and utilizes the studio time and clean up time.
Level 5

*The student is always willing to complete assigned tasks and help set up and clean up projects.
*Student always works well with others.
*Student always uses studio time and clean up time well.
Responsiveness

~Positive effort and responce to the tasks at hand.
Level 1

*The student showed negative responses throughout the development of the piece from introduction, demonstrations, studio time, to finish.
*The student did not ask for help.
*Off task a majority of the time.
Level 2

*The student showed negative responses, at times, throughout the development of the piece.
*The student seldomly asked for help.
*Off task throughout the project.
Level 3

*The student showed positive response most of the time during the development of the piece.
*The student asked for help when finding something difficult, but kept trying.
*Off task at different times during project.
Level 4

*The student showed positive response all of the time during the development of the piece.
*The student asked for help and responded well to suggestions.
*Seldom off task.
Level 5

*The student showed positive responses all of the time during the development of the piece and was appropriately helpful to others and/ or the teacher during the process.
*The student asked questions and showed their understanding in the work.
*Always on task.
Value change

~Contrast between shapes.
Level 1

*No Value change within each individual shape.
*No contrast present.
Level 2

*Value change within each shape is basic. *Not a lot of contrast in each shape. A lot of Gray values.
Level 3

*Value change within most shapes is basic.
*Missing contrast in some of the shapes.
Level 4

*Each shape has individual consideration to the value change.
*Contrast from light to dark was considered within each shape.
Level 5

*Each shape has individual consideration to the value change.
*Great contrast from light to dark within each shape.





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98