- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Group 4 Science Research Project- Group 3 rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Group 4 Science Research Project- Group 3 Group 4 Science Research Project- Group 3 Rubric Code: TX32859 By marshc2 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Science Type: Presentation Grade Levels: 9-12

Introduction
	Not Present 0 pts	Poor 1 pts	Acceptable 2 pts	N/A 0 pts	N/A 0 pts
Project Title/Research Question The project title and research question should be shared verbally and present in the visual component.	Not Present Project Title and Research Question not evident	Poor Project Title and Research Question only shared verbally or only present in the visual component	Acceptable Project Title and Research Question both shared verbally and present in the visual component	N/A	N/A
Background Student should present a brief background on the significance of the project and the current research related to the topic.	Not Present No background or significance of project given	Poor Background or significance given but not explained	Acceptable Background and significance of project fully explained	N/A	N/A
Purpose for choosing project Student should share personal reasons for choosing this project.	Not Present No purpose for choosing project given	Poor Purpose for choosing project mentioned	Acceptable Purpose for choosing project explained	N/A	N/A
Experiment Section
	Component Not Present 0 pts	Poor 1 pts	Acceptable 2 pts	Excellent 3 pts	N/A 0 pts
Hypothesis Student should state and explain the hypothesis.	Component Not Present No hypothesis stated	Poor Hypothesis stated but not in the correct form	Acceptable N/A	Excellent Hypothesis is clearly stated in the correct form, demonstrates a cause and effect relationship, and is testable	N/A
Experimental Procedure Student should summarize the experimental procedure, including pictures.	Component Not Present Experimental procedures not described and no pictures presented	Poor Experimental procedures mentioned but not explained or no pictures present	Acceptable	Excellent Experimental procedures thoroughly described and picture(s) present	N/A
Variables Student should differentiate between and describe the independent and dependent variable used in the experiment.	Component Not Present No variables identified	Poor Variables mentioned, but incorrectly identified OR independent variable not sufficiently altered	Acceptable Variables correctly identified and independent variable sufficiently altered	Excellent Variables thoroughly described and independent variable sufficiently altered	N/A
Results Section
	Component Not Present 0 pts	Poor 1 pts	Acceptable 2 pts	Excellent 3 pts	N/A 0 pts
Presentation of Results Student should use data tables to show the results of the experiment.	Component Not Present No data tables present.	Poor Data tables present but not described OR not properly labeled	Acceptable Data tables present, properly labeled, and described	Excellent Data tables present, properly titled and labeled, and thoroughly explained	N/A
Identification of Trends Student should use a summative graph to identify trends in the data.	Component Not Present	Poor Graph is present but is completed incorrectly OR is not summative OR trends not identified	Acceptable	Excellent Graph is of high quality and trends are identified and used to make predictions	N/A
Discussion of Error Student should identify sources of error and its effect on the results.	Component Not Present Sources of error not identified	Poor Some sources of error identified but effects on results not described	Acceptable Some sources of error identified and effects on results accurately described	Excellent Sources of error thoroughly explored and effects on results accurately described	N/A
Conclusion Section
	Component Not Present 0 pts	Poor 1 pts	Acceptable 2 pts	Excellent 3 pts	N/A 0 pts
Conclusion drawn Student should explain whether the results support or refute the hypothesis and explain their conclusions.	Component Not Present Hypothesis not mentioned and no conclusions reached	Poor Surface level conclusions reached but no mention of original hypothesis	Acceptable Hypothesis supported or refuted and conclusions are thoughtful	Excellent Hypothesis supported or refuted and conclusions demonstrate deep understanding of the project	N/A
Value of work explained Student should identify the value of their work to the broader scientific community. If the work does not seem to be of value, the student should explain personal insights gained.	Component Not Present Value of work OR insights gained not identified	Poor Value of work OR insights gained briefly mentioned	Acceptable Value of work OR insights gained shared and demonstrate surface level reflection	Excellent Value of work OR insights gained shared and demonstrate deep levels of reflection	N/A
Extensions Student should explain ideas for further work on the topic or ways the current project could be improved	Component Not Present Ideas for further work or project improvements not mentioned	Poor Ideas for further work OR project improvements mentioned	Acceptable Both ideas for further work AND project improvements mentioned	Excellent Both ideas for further work AND project improvements described and rationale for suggestions included	N/A
Presentation Quality
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts	N/A 0 pts
Professionalism The presentation should be given in a professional manner and be of high quality.	Poor Presenter is not organized, does not speak loudly or clearly, avoids eye contact, or exhibits distracting behaviors (i.e. pacing, saying "um" or "ah", etc.)	Fair Presenter is fairly well prepared, speaks loudly or clearly but could use more practice, maintains some eye contact, and avoids some distracting behaviors (i.e. pacing, saying "um" or "ah", etc.)	Good Presenter is well prepared, speaks loudly and clearly, generally maintains eye contact, and avoids most distracting behaviors (i.e. pacing, saying "um" or "ah", etc.)	Excellent Presenter is well prepared, speaks loudly and clearly, maintains eye contact with the audience, and avoids all distracting behaviors (i.e. pacing, saying "um" or "ah", etc.)	N/A
Question and Answer
	Poor 1 pts	Acceptable 2 pts	Excellent 3 pts	N/A 0 pts	N/A 0 pts
Q&A Student should demonstrate knowledge about the project by responding to the panel's questions as accurately and honestly as possible.	Poor Student does not demonstrate an understanding of the project or presents inaccurate information in response to questions.	Acceptable Student demonstrates an understanding of the project and answers questions accurately.	Excellent Student demonstrates an exceptional level of understanding of the project and answers questions accurately.	N/A	N/A
Project Components
	Below Expectations (N/A)	Below Expectations (N/A)	Acceptable 0 pts	Above Average (N/A)	Advanced (N/A)
Presentation Time Student should present a 13-15 minute oral report.	Below Expectations Presentation is 7-9 minutes or 16+ minutes.<BR> <BR> <BR> (-2 Points)	Below Expectations Presentation is 10-12 minutes or 15-16 minutes.<BR> <BR> <BR> (-1 Point)	Acceptable Presentation is 13-15 minutes.	Above Average N/A	Advanced N/A
Visual Component	Below Expectations Visual Component Not Present<BR> <BR> (-2 Points)	Below Expectations Visual Component Not Present<BR> <BR> (-2 Points)	Acceptable Visual Component Present	Above Average Visual Component is high quality and visually attractive.<BR> <BR> (+ 1 Bonus Point)	Advanced Visual Component is very high quality and visually impressive.<BR> <BR> (+ 2 Bonus Points)

Keywords:

Group 4, Oral Report

Subjects:

Science

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric