Skip to main content
iRubric: Proposal for NACADA Conference rubric

iRubric: Proposal for NACADA Conference rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Proposal for NACADA Conference 
Presenter's Name:_____________________________________ Overall score:__________
Rubric Code: TX2X6W2
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Post Graduate

Powered by iRubric Proposal for NACADA Presentation
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Saisfactory

3 pts

Good

4 pts

Score

(N/A)

Comments

(N/A)

Purpose and subject matter

Poor

The proposal topic is an inappropriate subject and has no clear objectives.
Fair

Topic is too general and unclear as to how the objectives will be achieved
Saisfactory

Proposal is appropriate and has a stated objectives, but is unclear as to how objectives will be achieved
Good

Purpose is appropriate for the conference, has stated objective,s and it is clear as to how presenter will attain objectives
Score
Comments
Topic

Poor

The topic is not novel or innovative. Does not incorporate the theme of "Play Ball- Advising in the Big Leagues"
Fair

The topic is somewhat related to issues in the field and of interest, but is not innovative.
Saisfactory

The topic is not innovative, but focuses on issues that are relevant and of interest. Conference theme is mentioned.
Good

The topic is current to the field and innovative. The conference theme is clearly incorporated into the proposal.
Score
Comments
Format

Poor

The topic is not focused; proposal is poorly written and lacks organization.Has low potential for engaging the audience
Fair

The topic is narrow or too general. The proposal shows some organization.Is a fairly well written proposal that lacks clarity.
Saisfactory

The proposal is focused and generally organized and well written.Lacks how the material will be presented to the audience
Good

The proposal very well written and focused. It explains how the presenter will introduce and present the material in a comprehensive way that well be highly engaging.
Score
Comments
Clarity of proposal

Poor

Proposal is not clear or organized and fails to address outcomes
Fair

Proposal addresses some outcomes, but does not state how they will be achieved
Saisfactory

Proposal is clear and provides a general sense as to how the outcomes will be achieved
Good

Proposal is well written and gives clear objectives as to participant outcomes and how they will be achieved
Score
Comments
Theory/practice/research

Poor

The proposal does not mention theory, practice or contribution to the field
Fair

Mentions some theory, practice, research but not in direct correlation to the presentation
Saisfactory

Discusses theory, practice, research to which the presentation is about in a clear way and relates it somewhat to the presentation
Good

Discusses the theory, practice, research in regard to the presentation and shows clearly how it is connected to the presentation in a relevant way
Score
Comments
Expertise of presenter

Poor

No experience in presenting at conferences
Fair

Has presented at l-2 conferences
Saisfactory

Has presented at 3-4 conferences
Good

Extensive experience presenting at conferences
Score
Comments




Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16