Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Leadership Project Paper rubric

iRubric: Leadership Project Paper rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Leadership Project Paper Leadership Project Paper Rubric Code: SXW59AC By oconnojj Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Communication Type: Project Grade Levels: Graduate

Leadership Project Paper
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Average 3 pts	Above Average 4 pts	Excellent 5 pts	Omitted 0 pts
Final Product
Summary 10 % Summarization of the experience thoroughly, appropriately & accurately	Poor Excluded nearly all the necessary information, poorly written, nearly incomprehensible	Fair A significant amount of information was excluded, reader struggles to understand fully the points being made by the author	Average Satisfactorily completed requirement, though some necessary information was left out; could use some further explanation	Above Average Good inclusion of important information, could need either a little more information for best reader clarity, or less verbose explanation for better comprehension/flow	Excellent Fully addressed the topic/task in a clear, complete, and effective manner; clearly demonstrated command of the topic and fully incorporated it into the paper	Omitted Did not include the task/topic, left out completely
Class Applications 10 % Thorough application of the topics covered in class to the experience	Poor Very little evidence of the application of class topics to the experience was present in the paper	Fair Little evidence of the application of class topics to the experience was present in the paper	Average Some evidence of the application of class topics to the experience was present in the paper	Above Average Evidence of the application of class topics to the experience was present in the paper	Excellent Much evidence of the application of class topics to the experience was prevalent throughout the entirety of the paper	Omitted Did not include the task/topic, left out completely
Relevant Concepts 10 % Relevant concepts were incorporated: Mission Statement, specific examples and elaborations etc.	Poor Excluded nearly all the necessary information, poorly written, nearly incomprehensible	Fair A significant amount of information was excluded, reader struggles to understand fully the points being made by the author	Average Satisfactorily completed requirement, though some necessary information was left out; could use some further explanation	Above Average Good inclusion of important information, could need either a little more information for best reader clarity, or less verbose explanation for better comprehension/flow	Excellent Fully addressed the topic/task in a clear, complete, and effective manner; clearly demonstrated command of the topic and fully incorporated it into the paper	Omitted Did not include the task/topic, left out completely
Explanations/Comparisons 10 % Relevant concepts were explained and compared to the topics covered in class	Poor Struggled to find reference to any topics explained/compared to a topic covered in class	Fair Made a reference to a topic covered in class and related it back to the experience; l	Average Occasionally made reference to a topic(s) covered in class and related it back to the experience; s	Above Average Successfully explained and tied many of the topics discussed in the paper back to what was discussed in class/lab regarding successful communication strategies	Excellent Successfully tied all/nearly all of the topics discussed in the paper back to what was discussed in class/lab regarding successful communication strategies	Omitted Did not include the task/topic, left out completely
Critical Thinking 15 % Demonstrated chiropractic insight (rather than personal opinion) by using critical thinking and/or adequately supporting the answers/positions to questions	Poor Almost completely personal opinion; reader can discern no obvious chiropractic insight or adequate support for the author's opinion(s)	Fair Mostly personal opinion; reader can discern little evidence of chiropractic insight or adequate support for the author's opinion(s)	Average Satisfactory use of chiropractic insight or adequate support for the author's opinion(s), though some additional support/evidence is needed	Above Average Good inclusion of chiropractic insight and/or adequate support for the author's opinion(s)	Excellent Completely supported all personal opinion; reader can easily detect obvious chiropractic insight and adequate support for the author's opinion(s)	Omitted Did not include the task/topic, left out completely
Persuasion/Passion 5 % Convinced the reader of the lessons learned by the author through this experience	Poor Reader is unconvinced due to lack of or inappropriate use of reasoning, logic, or lack of evidence provided in the paper	Fair Reader is lacking much of what is required to be convinced of the lessons learned	Average Reader was somewhat convinced via appropriate logic, reasoning, evidence, and passionate/persuasive writing of the lessons learned by the experience	Above Average Reader was mostly convinced via appropriate logic, reasoning, evidence, and passionate/persuasive writing of the lessons learned by the experience	Excellent Reader was fully convinced via appropriate logic, reasoning, evidence, and passionate/persuasive writing of the lessons learned by the experience	Omitted No
References 5 % Cited correctly, where appropriate	Poor Little attempt was made to cite correctly; no attention to the required type of citation was evidenced	Fair Attempted to cite where appropriate but had some significant errors in the type or form of citation used	Average Cited correctly for the most part; left off an important component or used an incorrect form of citation	Above Average Very minor error(s) in citation	Excellent Cited correctly according to the paper instructions without errors; has a correct works cited page	Omitted Did not cite where appropriate
Paper Structure/Flow 15 % Utilized proper editing, grammar, formatting and proofreading	Poor almost no command of the English language: the entire paper was plagued with inappropriate use of spelling, grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, improper document editing, and absolutely no evidence of proofreading	Fair lacks command of the English language as evident through inappropriate use of spelling, grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure; as well there was improper document editing, and lack of evident proofreading	Average adequate use of the English language, although some incorrect spelling, grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, improper document editing, was present throughout; evidence of only minor proofreading	Above Average showed good command of the English language through mostly appropriate use of spelling, grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, proper document editing, and proofreading	Excellent clear command of the English language though appropriate use of spelling, grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, proper document editing, and proofreading	Omitted Unreadable due to improper use of editing, grammar, formatting and proofreading
Draft/Revision Process
Preparation 5 % Did the student submit their choice of option on time?	Poor ---	Fair ---	Average ---	Above Average ---	Excellent Yes	Omitted No
Peer Review 10 % Did the student fully, adequately and efficiently revise the paper they peer reviewed?	Poor Did not offer many helpful or accurate suggestions/changes; did a poor job editing with lots of mistakes left uncorrected or made several suggestions that were incorrect	Fair Only offered a few helpful or accurate suggestions/changes; did a sub-par job editing with some mistakes left uncorrected or made a few suggestions that were incorrect	Average Offered helpful and accurate suggestions. Did an adequate job editing with only an occasional error left uncorrected or an incorrect suggestion	Above Average Did a good job offering accurate suggestions; edited correctly	Excellent Went above and beyond with offering excellent suggestions that made significant improvements to the student's final product; demonstrated excellent editing skills without mistakes or uncorrected errors	Omitted Did not peer review
Revisions 5 % Is the final paper submitted reflective of a “rough draft to final draft” process wherein the final product is significantly different/improved from the original draft?	Poor Shows almost no change from the rough draft to the final; the final product is sub-par and should have been further revised	Fair Shows little change and improvements to the final draft; didn't seem to take much of what was suggested by the peer reviewer into account when revising the paper; the final product is lacking and could use more revision	Average Shows some transformation demonstrating that the student took a few suggestions made by the peer reviewer into consideration and produced a final product that had some improvement from the first draft	Above Average Shows some good transformation demonstrating that the student took suggestions made by the peer reviewer into consideration and produced a good final product	Excellent Shows a complete transformation demonstrating that the student took the suggestions made by the peer reviewer into full consideration and produced an excellent final product	Omitted No change from rough draft to final product

Subjects:

Communication

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Communication rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n98