- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Supreme Court Case-Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Supreme Court Case-Presentation Supreme Court Case-Presentation Supreme Court Case Argumentation Presentation Rubric Code: SX8X8BC By nvantangoli Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Law Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12

Case Study Presentation
	Poor 5 points 0 pts	Fair 10 points 2 pts	Average 15 points 3 pts	Good 20 points 4 pts	Exemplary 25 points 5 pts
Case Facts & Background	Poor Identifies & understands almost none of the basic information.	Fair Identifies & understands few of the basic case. Little or no research done.	Average Identifies & understands some of the case facts. A minimal amount of research done.	Good Identifies & understands most of the case facts. Some research done.	Exemplary Identifies & understands the case, the parties involved, the time frame. Extensive research is obvious.
Argumentation of Case	Poor petitioner/respondent argumentation was mainly non-existant	Fair petitioner/respondent argumentation was marginal in its coverage of the case	Average petitioner/respondent argumentation was somewhat thorough in its coverage of the case with inconsistent depth shown	Good petitioner/respondent argumentation was reasonably thorough in depth of the given case. Students were able to explain portions of the case beyond the slide.	Exemplary petitioner/respondent argumentation was very thorough and students have a deep understanding of the arguments of the case and can extrapolate and give analogies and further examples when prompted.
Presentation	Poor Poor execution all the way through.	Fair Case weakened during critical time but was unable to be regained.	Average Case weakened during critical time , but was able to be regained.	Good For the most part, the case flowed well.	Exemplary Case flowed very well from opening statement through closing statement.
Oral Presentation Style	Poor The speakers didn't seem to know little or nothing about the case.	Fair Speakers were confusing to the audience. They seemed to know about the case, but struggled to make the information clear to the audience.	Average Speakers were somewhat clear in their presentation. Hesitation and/or volume control issues made some parts of the presentation difficult to understand.	Good Speakers were mostly clear and usually knew what they were saying. Some hesitation or volume control issues occurred.	Exemplary Speakers were clear and well-informed. When the teacher or audience asked questions, the presenters were able to reply coherently and with thoughtful and in depth answers.