Skip to main content
iRubric: GROUP Presentation Rubric

iRubric: GROUP Presentation Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
GROUP Presentation Rubric 
SOLO Presentation Rubric
Rubric for evaluating GROUP student presentations.
Rubric Code: PCB9X7
By NeilTurner
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric GROUP Presentation Rubric
  Poor

0-69 pts

(N/A)

Fair

70-79 pts

(N/A)

Good

80-89 pts

(N/A)

Excellent

90-100 pts

(N/A)

Research

Poor

Group did not research assigned topic or performed less than bare minimum research (two sources), untrustworthy sources or group used Wikipedia as a source.
Fair

Group did adequate but not in-depth research of assigned topic. Group used a few sources only, and/or they were untrustworthy and/or from the Wikipedia.
Good

Group conducted thorough, accurate research from multiple, trustworthy sources not being Wikipedia.
Excellent

Group's research exceeds expectations and utilizes more than three accurate, verifiable sources. Student makes research discoveries unknown or unanticipated by the instructor.
Execution

Poor

Group did not turn research into a focused, professional presentation. Presentation was either far too short or too long. Some members of the group did not participate in presentation.
Fair

Group's research reflected in presentation but not focused or professional. Presentation was with one minute over or under the allotted time limit. Unequal presentation roles or presentation left to those not skilled.
Good

Group's presentation was focused, professional and reflected the culmination of their research. Presentation was within thirty seconds of the time limit over or under. Equal participation amongst all in preparation or presentation.
Excellent

Presentation was within a few seconds of time limit. Presentation was professional, focused, reflected the culmination of the students' research and exceeded expectations for the group presentations. Presentation included all group members equally.
Critical Thinking

Poor

Group applied no initiative to presentation. Presentation was basic superficial overview with no ideas or direction on student's part.
Fair

Group applied limited critical thinking to presentation, relying largely on one source to direct the nature of the presentation.
Good

Group used their own initiative and critical thinking to apply subject and research data to shape a presentation the was comprehensive and unique.
Excellent

Group's initiative and free-thought created a presentation that was appropriate to the subject and accurate, yet embodied a perspective unique to and created by the group as a whole.
Collaboration

Poor

Group did not work effectively to assign roles appropriately based on skill sets or to collaborate towards creating and presenting.
Fair

Groups did not appropriately assign roles based on skills or fairly delegate responsibilities. Only minimal effort to collaborate on presentation.
Good

Presentations reflect an adequate level of collaboration by student groups. Roles are assigned fairly and responsibilities are equally delegated. Ideas are mutually respected.
Excellent

Group excels at equal work delegation, positive feedback and mutual respect. Presentations reflect culmination of everyone's efforts.
Communication

Poor

Group communicated poorly with each other, could not communicate their own thoughts and feelings, offered each other little or no feedback
Fair

Group's communication was ineffective or not enough, some but not enough peer feedback, misunderstood roles or responsibilities
Good

Group utilized effective communication that resulted in quality presentation - good feedback with little instructor oversight
Excellent

Group's communication was independent and required no instructor oversight. Group's use of effective communication, peer feedback and mutual respect of ideas resulted in a high-quality presentation.
Creativity

Poor

Group applied no creativity or original thinking or ideas to their presentation.
Fair

Group applied minimal creativity or original ideas to presentation.
Good

Group applied adequate creativity to presentation - demonstrating original thinking in their approach to their presentation.
Excellent

Group's presentation excelled in creativity - using a novel, or particularly attention-getting approach.
Technical

Poor

Group used no or poor use of technology, 21st century web 2.0 tools to research, create or to present.
Fair

Minimal use by group of technology, 21st century web 2.0 tools to research, create or to present.
Good

Good use by group of technology, 21st century web 2.0 tools to research, create AND to present. Technology chosen shows adequate research as to which tools to use, not just first one found.
Excellent

Excellent use by group of technology, 21st century web 2.0 tools to research, create AND to present. Technology chosen shows detailed research as to which tools to use, not just first one found. New web 2.0 tools unknown to instructor utilized.



Keywords:
  • Presentation Rubric GROUP



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16