Skip to main content
iRubric: Modes of Exposition 1 Example - Beowulf Essay rubric

iRubric: Modes of Exposition 1 Example - Beowulf Essay rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Modes of Exposition 1 Example - Beowulf Essay 
Compare/Contrast essay scoring rubric.
Rubric Code: NX563A5
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Criteria for Essay
100 points
  Excellent

(N/A)

Good

(N/A)

Fair

(N/A)

Poor

(N/A)

Introduction/Thesis Statement

8 pts

Excellent

Very well developed introduction and thesis statement. They engage the reader and create interest. The Hook, transition, thesis model is clearly followed. Both the author (if available) and the title are present in the thesis. Organizational pattern for the paper is clearly established.
Good

Introduction and thesis statement create interest and are fairly well developed, they could be more engaging.
The Hook, transition, thesis model is followed. Organizational pattern for the paper is somewhat established.
Fair

Introduction and thesis statement introduce the subjects, but they either do not give accurate and complete information, or they do not emphasize the author's point for the rest of the paper. The Hook, transition, thesis model is attempted.
Poor

Introduction and thesis statement do not engage audience, or they may not be a complete sentence. No controlling point about the subjects is evident.
The intro might be part of the body paragraph.
If no introduction is present 0 points is awarded.
Body Paragraph 1

Topic Sentences & Supporting Details
12 pts

Excellent

Each paragraph contains a clearly focused topic sentence that relates to the thesis statement.<BR>
Details in the paragraphs are clear and specific, and there are enough details to create vivid images. The details clearly support the author's point for the example. At least on direct quote attributed to a source.
Good

Each paragraph contains a topic sentence that relates to the thesis statement.<BR>
Details are clear and specific, but they do not vividly support the author's point for the example. The support is good but not excellent.
Fair

The topic sentence is not clear or does not relate to the thesis statement.<BR>
OR There are details, but they are not clear, specific, and vivid. This may be lack of topic sentence or a dearth of support.
Poor

There are no apparent topic sentences for each paragraph.<BR>
OR details are either wrong or lacking. No vivid sense language is used. Or the details do not fit the author's point for the example.
Body Paragraph 2

Topic Sentences & Supporting Details
12 pts

12 pts

Excellent

Each paragraph contains a clearly focused topic sentence that relates to the thesis statement.<BR>
Details in the paragraphs are clear and specific, and there are enough details to create vivid images. The details clearly support the author's point for the example. At least on direct quote attributed to a source.
Good

Each paragraph contains a topic sentence that relates to the thesis statement.<BR>
Details are clear and specific, but they do not vividly support the author's point for the example. The support is good but not excellent.
Fair

The topic sentence is not clear or does not relate to the thesis statement.<BR>
OR There are details, but they are not clear, specific, and vivid. This may be lack of topic sentence or a dearth of support.
Poor

There are no apparent topic sentences for each paragraph.<BR>
OR details are either wrong or lacking. No vivid sense language is used. Or the details do not fit the author's point for the example.
Body Paragraph 3

Topic Sentences & Supporting Details
12 pts

Excellent

Each paragraph contains a clearly focused topic sentence that relates to the thesis statement.<BR>
Details in the paragraphs are clear and specific, and there are enough details to create vivid images. The details clearly support the author's point for the example. At least on direct quote attributed to a source.
Good

Each paragraph contains a topic sentence that relates to the thesis statement.<BR>
Details are clear and specific, but they do not vividly support the author's point for the example. The support is good but not excellent.
Fair

The topic sentence is not clear or does not relate to the thesis statement.<BR>
OR There are details, but they are not clear, specific, and vivid. This may be lack of topic sentence or a dearth of support.
Poor

There are no apparent topic sentences for each paragraph.<BR>
OR details are either wrong or lacking. No vivid sense language is used. Or the details do not fit the author's point for the example.
Conclusion

8pts

Excellent

The concluding paragraph effectively unifies the essay around the subject and leaves the reader satisfied with a thought provoking ending.
Good

The concluding paragraph unifies the essay around the subject, but it is not very engaging or interesting.
Fair

The concluding paragraph makes a point, but it does not unify or "wrap-up" the essay effectively.
Poor

The conclusion is not related to the remainder of the essay or may be 1 sentence. It might be attached to a body paragraph.

There is no conclusion evident in the essay receives 0 points.
Overall Organization

Unity & Coherence
8 pts

Excellent

The details are in a clear effective order that is established in the introduction. Transitions are effective and not formulaic or forced. Body paragraphs are roughly the same length.
Good

The details are in a clear effective order that is established in the introduction. Transitions may not be effective or may be formulaic or forced. OR Body paragraphs may be different lengths.
Fair

The details are in a clear effective order but it may not be established in the introduction. AND Transitions may not be effective or may be formulaic or forced. OR Body paragraphs may be different lengths.
Poor

No discernible organization. Details are either missing or not in any discernible order.

Transitions are consistently used incorrectly.
Style: sentence flow, tone, and

12 pts

Excellent

Writing is smooth, skillful, and coherent. Sentences are strong and expressive with varied structure. Consistent and appropriate tone and word choice is used throughout the essay. Transitions are appropriate and add to the effectiveness of the essay. Quotes are integrated smoothly.
Good

Writing is clear and sentences have varied structure. There is consistent tone and word choice is appropriate with fairly good use of transitions to guide the reader. Quotes integration may need work but is still effective.
Fair

Writing is clear, but sentences may lack variety. The tone is inconsistent and word choice, while adequate, could be better. While transitions are present they do not add to the overall effectiveness of the essay. Quotes integration may be choppy or quotes may just be inserted as stand-alone sentences. ANY STAND ALONE QUOTES RESULT IN A DEDUCTION OF POINTS.
Poor

Writing is confusing and hard to follow. Contains fragments and/or run-on sentences. The tone and purpose is inconsistent and difficult to determine. Transitions are either missing or inappropriate. Quote integration makes it difficult to read or understand.
Mechanics

12 pts

Excellent

No errors in punctuation, spelling, grammar, or capitalization.
Good

A few minor errors in punctuation, spelling, grammar, or capitalization, but they do not detract from the overall meaning and effectiveness of the essay.
Fair

A few errors in punctuation, grammar, spelling, and capitalization that. while distracting, the meaning and intent of the essay can still be discerned.
Poor

Distracting and major errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization.
MLA Format

4

Excellent

header, page number perfect
Good

1 error
Fair

2 errror
Poor

0 points awarded for more than two errors
Works Cited and in text citation

12

Excellent

each paragraph cited
works cited page perfect. The Works Cited page is titled and the list alphabetized. Each body paragraph has well cited paraphrases, summaries, and quotes. Short and long quotes are differentiated by proper formatting.
Good

1 citation may be missing or there
may be a few errors in spacing or format on works cited page.

The in text citation may have p. or l. or the periods may be incorrectly placed consistently. The citation is sufficient to establish credibility.
Fair

1-2 citations may be missing
may have a several errors in spacing or format on works cited page.

There may be a lack of citation to establish credibility.
Poor

2-3 citations may be missing
may have significant errors in spacing or format on works cited page

in text citation is sporadic or missing.

0 points is awarded for lack of citation or Works Cited page.



Keywords:
  • Compare/Contrast essay, rubric, writing components

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16