- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Cohabitation Project- 30 points rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Cohabitation Project- 30 points Content Analysis Project- 20 points SOC 4- SLO #3 Student will analyze current sociological research to identify methods, variables and findings. Rubric Code: NB9B38 By proflevym Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Social Sciences Type: Assignment Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Content Analysis
	Poor 2 pts	Fair 3 pts	Good 5 pts	Quality Paper 8 pts
Summary of research (8)	Poor Student did not summarize the research adequately.	Fair Student covered some of the details from the research but needed to cover more in their summary.	Good Student covered most of the important details in their summary of the research on cohabitation.	Quality Paper Student covered all the important details in their summary of the research on cohabitation.
Research method variables(5)	Poor Student failed to describe the exact steps in measuring and completing the research.	Fair Student partially described some of the ways researchers measured their subjects, completed their studies or studied the people involved in their research and covered some variables	Good Student described all the ways researchers measured their subjects, completed their studies or studied the people involved in their research and included majority of variables used in research	Quality Paper
Criticism of Research(3)	Poor Student failed to describe what was left out of the research or what they would be interested in researching on this topic.	Fair Student partially described what was left out of the research or what they would be interested in researching on this topic.	Good Student completely described what was left out of the research or what they would be interested in researching on this topic.	Quality Paper
Advice to others (4)	Poor Student failed to discuss what they would tell a couple who is thinking about cohabitating, based on this research.	Fair Student briefly discussed what they would tell a couple who is thinking about cohabitating, but did not use the data as evidence.	Good Student did a good job discussing what they would tell a couple who is thinking about cohabitating, by using the data as evidence for their perspective.	Quality Paper
Data Sheet (5)	Poor Student did not include a data sheet with sufficient data to include in summary.	Fair Student did include a data sheet with some data necessary with some evidence to support analysis.	Good Student did include a data sheet with necessary data to include in their summary of data analysis.	Quality Paper
Quality of writing (5)	Poor Student's paper was poorly written due to grammar and spelling errors.	Fair Student's paper was poorly written but could use more help in grammar and spelling errors.	Good Student's paper was properly written but had minor or no grammar and/or spelling errors.	Quality Paper