- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Graphing Linear Equations: Stained Glass rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Graphing Linear Equations: Stained Glass Graphing Linear Equations: Stained Glass In this project, students must graph 12 linear equations on a coordinate plane in order to create a "stained glass" pattern. Students will choose 12 of 24 linear equations, create t-tables to find at least 3 points for each equation, and graph the corresponding line for that equation. All lines must be clearly labeled with the appropriate equation. Rubric Code: MXW585C By csirmon Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Math Type: Project Grade Levels: 6-8

Graphing Linear Equations
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Completeness	Poor The student completed 8 or fewer t-tables/graphs OR completed one portion (graphs or t-tables) and missed 50% or more of the other portion.	Fair The student completed 9 - 10 t-tables/graphs OR completed one portion (graphs or tables) and missed no more than 25% of the other portion.	Good The student completed 11 t-tables/graphs, OR completed one portion (graphs or tables) and missed 2 of the other portion.	Excellent The student completed all t-tables and all graphs.
Accuracy	Poor Fewer than 65% of t-tables and graphs are accurate.	Fair 65% - 75% of t-tables and graphs are accurate.	Good 80% - 90% of t-tables and graphs are accurate.	Excellent 95% - 100% of t-tables are accurate, and all lines are graphed correctly.
Final Presentation	Poor Final product is overall messy, and it is clear the student did not take care to turn in quality work. Student did not edit for errors.	Fair Final product is messy in places, and the student took little care to turn in quality work. Student did not edit for errors.	Good Final product is neat, and the student took care to turn in quality work. However, the student did not carefully edit for errors.	Excellent Final product is neat, and it is clear that the student took great care to turn in quality work. Student edited carefully for errors.
Working Efficiently	Poor Student did not use time efficiently, was distracting to others, and did not complete much of the project OR turned in the project more than 6 days late.	Fair Student needed considerable help to stay on task, was unfocused much of the time, and completed only some of the project OR turned in the project 1 - 5 days late.	Good Student needed some help staying on task, was focused most of the time, and finished most of the project. The project was not turned in late.	Excellent Student worked independently, diligently, and needed few to no prompts to stay on task. The student finished the project on time.