- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Alabama Natural Resources and Regions rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Alabama Natural Resources and Regions Rubric Code: MX46C26 By cplott Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Social Sciences Type: Assessment Grade Levels: (none)

Alabama Nat. Resources and Regions
	great 4 pts	good 3 pts	fair 2 pts	poor 1 pts
Regions (labeled)	great All 5 natural resources are identified and accurately labeled. It is clear which label goes with which region	good Almost all 5 natural resources are identified and have labels. 1 or less are missing or labeled in correctly. It is clear which label goes with which region.	fair Most of the 5 natural resources are identified and have labels. 2 or less are missing or labeled incorrectly. It is clear which label goes with which structure.	poor More than 2 natural resources are missing or were labeled incorrectly. It is not clear which label goes with which region.
Enter Drawing(coloring detail)	great All 5 natural resources are colored and easily distinguished from one another.	good Almost all natural resources are colored. The details are clear and easy to identify.	fair Most of the 5 natural resources are colored. 2 or less are missing or are difficult to identify.	poor Natural resources lack color and are difficult to distinguish from one another.
Map Key	great Map key is present and labeled accurately. All 5 natural resources are identified on map key and are in the correct regions.	good Map key is present and labeled accurately. Almost all natural resources are identified on map key and are in the correct regions.	fair Map key is present but items are missing. Less than 2 natural resources are missing from map key and are not in the correct regions.	poor Map key is inaccurate or lacking overall. More then 2 natural resources are missing are are difficult to identify and are not in the correct regions.
Participation	great Worked well in group. Took turns discussing, writing, and sharing information.	good Worked well in group however, had to be redirected. Took turns discussing, sharing information but had to be redirected.	fair Worked in group but didn't get the work done like we should have. Too much time spent on other things and had to be redirected several times.	poor Didn't work well in group. Had to be redirected too many times and there wasn't a lot of discussion.