Glogster
100 %
|
| |
Needs Improvement
1 pts
|
Fair
2 pts
|
Good
3 pts
|
Excellent
4 pts
|
Graphics
20 %
|
Needs Improvement
Graphics seem randomly chosen, are of low quality, OR distract the reader.
Less than 3 images are present or visuals have no relation and/or detract from meaning.
|
Fair
Graphics are related to the theme/purpose of the Glog, and are of good quality.
At least 3 images and/or video are present. Relation between visuals and content may not be clear and/or may detract from meaning.
|
Good
Graphics are related to the theme/purpose of the Glog, are of good quality and enhance reader interest or understanding.
At least 4 images and 1 video are present. Visuals are related to content and support meaning.
|
Excellent
Graphics are related to the theme/purpose of the Glog, are cropped and sized, are of high quality and enhance reader interest or understanding.
At least 5 images and 1 video are present. Visuals support the content and enhance meaning.
|
Sounds
5 %
|
Needs Improvement
Music, audio clips and/or sounds were seemingly used randomly OR typically detracted from the overall Glog.
|
Fair
Music, audio clips and/
or sounds are thoughtfully edited and used, but 1 or 2 detracted from the overall Glog.
|
Good
Music, audio clips and/or sounds are used only where they add to reader understanding of the content.
|
Excellent
Music, audio clips and/
or sounds are thoughtfully edited and used only where they
add to reader understanding of the content.
|
Content
20 %
|
Needs Improvement
Examples for each topic lack originality and are too vague to show what was learned in the course.
|
Fair
Most examples for each topic are original and detailed in showing what was learned in the course.
|
Good
All examples for each topic are original and detailed, showing the specific skills learned in the course.
|
Excellent
All examples for each topic are insightful, original and detailed, showing the specific skills learned in the course.
|
Organization and Design
20 %
|
Needs Improvement
Missing items; disorganized, messy.
|
Fair
Adequate; needs more work and attention to detail, somewhat organized.
|
Good
Page is well designed. Attractive and Appealing; neat and complete, easy to follow & understand.
|
Excellent
Page design is engaging and cohesive.
Eye catching, and organized, beyond expectations.
|
Color Choices
5 %
|
Needs Improvement
Colors of background, fonts, frames, and players make the content hard to read or otherwise distract the reader.
|
Fair
Colors of background, fonts, frames, and players do not detract from the content.
|
Good
Colors of background, fonts, frames, and players look very good together, do not detract from the content, and are consistent across pages.
|
Excellent
Colors of background, fonts, frames, and players look great together, do not detract from the content, and are consistent across pages.
|
Pursuasiveness
30 %
|
Needs Improvement
Student did not appear to learn much from this course. Unlikely to convince another student to take BTT.
|
Fair
The student has a fair understanding of the course. Somewhat convincing for another student to take BTT.
|
Good
The student has a good understanding of the course. Can easily convince another student to take BTT.
|
Excellent
The student has an exceptional understanding of the course. Can easily convince another student to take BTT.
|
Ready to use
Public Rubric
RCampus
twitter
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
email a friend
help on this page