Skip to main content
iRubric: "The Crucible" Test - Part IV rubric

iRubric: "The Crucible" Test - Part IV rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
"The Crucible" Test - Part IV 
Rubric Code: LXX33X7
By sdoremus
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric "The Crucible" Test Essay
  4

4 pts

3

3 pts

2

2 pts

1

1 pts

0

0 pts

Comprehension

4

The student response provides an accurate analysis of what the text says explicitly and inferentially and cites convincing textual evidence to support the analysis, showing full comprehension of complex ideas expressed in the text(s).
3

The student response provides an accurate analysis of what the text says explicitly and inferentially and cites textual evidence to support the analysis, showing extensive comprehension of ideas expressed in the text(s).
2

The student response provides a mostly accurate analysis of what the text says explicitly or inferentially and cites textual evidence; shows a basic comprehension of ideas expressed in the text(s).
1

The student response provides a minimally accurate analysis of what the text says and cites textual evidence; shows limited comprehension of ideas expressed in the text(s).
0

The student response provides an inaccurate analysis or no analysis of the text, showing little to no comprehension of ideas expressed in the text(s).
Development of Ideas

4

The student response addresses the prompt and provides effective and comprehensive development of the claim, topic and/or narrative elements by using clear and convincing reasoning, details, text-based evidence, and/or description; the development is consistently appropriate to the task, purpose, and audience.
3

The student response addresses the prompt and provides effective development of the claim, topic and/or narrative elements1 by using clear reasoning, details, text-based evidence, and/or description; the development is largely appropriate to the task, purpose, and audience.
2

The student response addresses the prompt and provides some development of the claim, topic and/or narrative elements1 by using some reasoning, details, text-based evidence, and/or description; the development is somewhat appropriate to the task, purpose, and audience.
1

The student response addresses the prompt and develops the claim, topic and/or narrative elements1 minimally by using limited reasoning, details, text-based evidence and/or description; the development is limited in its appropriateness to the task, purpose, and/or audience.
0

The student response is underdeveloped and therefore inappropriate to the task, purpose, and/or audience.
Organization

4

The student response demonstrates purposeful coherence, clarity, and cohesion2 and includes a strong introduction, conclusion, and a logical, well-executed progression of ideas, making it easy to follow the writer’s progression of ideas.
3

The student response demonstrates a great deal of coherence, clarity, and cohesion2, and includes an introduction, conclusion, and a logical progression of ideas, making it fairly easy to follow the writer’s progression of ideas.
2

The student response demonstrates some coherence, clarity, and/or cohesion2, and includes an introduction, conclusion, and logically grouped ideas, making the writer’s progression of ideas usually discernible but not obvious.
1

The student response demonstrates limited coherence, clarity, and/or cohesion2, making the writer’s progression of ideas somewhat unclear.
0

The student response demonstrates a lack of coherence, clarity and cohesion.2
Clarity of Language

4

The student response establishes and maintains an effective style, while attending to the norms and conventions of the discipline. The response uses precise language consistently, including descriptive words and phrases, sensory details, linking and transitional words, words to indicate tone3, and/or domain- specific vocabulary.
3

The student response establishes and maintains an effective style, while attending to the norms and conventions of the discipline. The response uses mostly precise language, including descriptive words and phrases, sensory details, linking and transitional words, words to indicate tone3, and/or domain-specific vocabulary.
2

The student response establishes and maintains a mostly effective style, while attending to the norms and conventions of the discipline. The response uses some precise language, including descriptive words and phrases, sensory details, linking and transitional words, words to indicate tone3 and/or domain- specific vocabulary.
1

The student response has a style that has limited effectiveness, with limited awareness of the norms of the discipline. The response includes limited descriptions, sensory details, linking or transitional words, words to indicate tone3, or domain-specific vocabulary.
0

The student response has an inappropriate style. The student writing shows little to no awareness of the norms of the discipline. The response includes little to no precise language.
Knowledge of Language Conventions

4

The student response demonstrates command of the conventions of standard English consistent with effectively edited writing. Though there may be a few minor errors in grammar and usage, meaning is clear throughout the response.
3

The student response demonstrates command of the conventions of standard English consistent with edited writing. There may be a few distracting errors in grammar and usage, but meaning is clear.
2

The student response demonstrates inconsistent command of the conventions of standard English. There are a few patterns of errors in grammar and usage that may occasionally impede understanding.
1

The student response demonstrates limited command of the conventions of standard English. There are multiple errors in grammar and usage demonstrating minimal control over language. There are multiple distracting errors in grammar and usage that sometimes impede understanding.
0

The student response demonstrates little to no command of the conventions of standard English. There are frequent and varied errors in grammar and usage, demonstrating little or no control over language. There are frequent distracting errors in grammar and usage that often impede understanding.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16