Skip to main content
iRubric: Group: Case Study Presentations rubric

iRubric: Group: Case Study Presentations rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Group: Case Study Presentations 
Group: Case Study Presentations
Group Case study presentation: Coaching Psychology
Rubric Code: LCC462
By aegan01
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Psychology  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Case Study Presentation
  Poor

(N/A)

Fair

(N/A)

Good

(N/A)

Excellent

(N/A)

Background Information
8 pts

As applicable to case:
History, life or, terminology
Poor

2pts. Little effort/quality. Missing information, lacked adequate depth, major omissions made
Fair

4pts. Presentation did not include key background information. Not enough information presented, & or information disorganized or inaccurate/contradictory
Good

6pts. Presentation included key information relevant to introducing topic; organized explanations were presented at an appropriate depth for class comprehension.
Excellent

8pts. Presentation included key information relevant to introducing the topic. Information is presented accurately, in appropriate detail & in an organized fashion.
Concepts and connections
16 pts

ability to relate to and link psychology into elements of the case
Poor

4pts. The topic idea was presented without psychological focus. Very little information relates back to psychological areas.
Fair

8pts. There was adequate links back to psychological ideas/concepts/theories. Connections between psychology and proposal topic appear weak.
Good

12pts. Connections between psychology and the central topic idea were clear and relevant.
Excellent

16pts. Connections between psychology and the central topic idea were clear, relevant, referenced and strong.
Thinking and Intuition
20 pts

Ability to display the presence of critical thinking in generating the sol.
Poor

5pts. Lack of critical or analytical thought and little to no insight utilized.
Fair

10pts. More details, insight, and critical thought needed.
Good

15pts. Proficient critical analysis of issue and impact using many details and evidence. Effective insight into the needs of the individual
Excellent

20pts. Exceptional insight into critical components & analysis of issue utilizing many details and evidence.
Organisation and execution
8 pts

Information is well organized, informative & easy to follow and clearly articulated
Poor

2pts. Work is done with little effort, quality. Major issues with organization of information. Overall message poorly communicated/ no clear point to the presentation
Fair

4pts. Some organisation evident and an indication provided as to the direction/point of the presentation.
Good

6pts. Well organised and the pain point of the presentation was clearly stated
Excellent

8pts. Very well organised, overlap was kept to a minimum, point of the presentation was very clear all the way through
Overall approach used
4 pts

The approach was appropriate aide a clear presentation
Poor

1pts. Little effort, poor quality. Stagnant, did little to engage the audience
Fair

2pts. Useful approach used, effort displayed to make the presentation interesting
Good

3pts. Approach used was effective and encouraged engagement from the audience/listeners, good effort shown by the presenters to make the presentation interesting
Excellent

4pts. Very effective approach used, the presentation was engaging and lively, an obvious effort was made by the participants to cater for the audience/listeners in the presentation
Group Pres.& time mgmt
20 pts

Presentation is creative. Presenters are well informed & well prepared.
Poor

5pts. The oral presentation was inarticulate and difficult to follow with poor cohesion between points presented. Presented by only a single member of the group.
Fair

10pts. The oral presentation was choppy, difficult to follow with little cohesion between points presented and between members of the group. Some of the members of the group participated in the presentation.
Good

15pts. The oral pres was mostly smooth and seamless with good cohesion bet points presented & bet members of the group. Most members of the group participated in the presentation.
Excellent

20pts. The oral presentation was smooth and seamless with excellent cohesion and flow between points and group members. All members of the group participated in the presentation.
Individual Pres Score
Indiv Pres & time mgnt.
24 pts

Presentation is creative. Presenters are well informed & well prepared.
Poor

6pts. The oral presentation was inarticulate and difficult to follow. Poor delivery and timing of information. Did not seem to know the material.
Fair

12pts. The oral presentation was choppy, difficult to follow. The presenter did not have a grasp on the information. Frequent pauses for him or her to find their place. Too much reading.
Good

18pts. The oral presentation was mostly smooth and seamless, few verbal pauses. The presenter appeared calm, had a general grasp of information. Proficient delivery and timing of information.
Excellent

24pts.The oral presentation was smooth and seamless. The presenter appeared calm and in command of the information. Exceptional delivery.





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16