- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Sport Management Discussion rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Sport Management Discussion Sport Management Discussion Assessment rubric for graduate students' discussion postings on current problems and issues in sport management Rubric Code: KXW5AAB By BeirutBruce Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Physical Ed., Fitness Type: Assignment Grade Levels: Graduate

Sport Management Debates
	Excellent 4 pts	Very Good 3 pts	Average 2 pts	Poor 1 pts	Unacceptable 0 pts
Debate Topic/ Preparation/ Research	Excellent Debate topic selection, preparation, research were excellently displayed	Very Good Debate topic selection, preparation, research were very evident	Average Debate topic selection, preparation, research were average and met standards	Poor Debate topic selection, preparation, or research were at the beginning level	Unacceptable No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Writing Appearance/ Poise	Excellent Appearance and poise were excellent and displayed extreme confidence	Very Good Appearance and poise were professional	Average Appearance and poise were average and met standard norms	Poor Appearance not professional and presenter not poised	Unacceptable No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Introduction/ Purpose	Excellent Introduction and purpose were excellently executed	Very Good Introduction and purpose were very well executed	Average Introduction and purpose were average and met standard norms	Poor Introduction and purpose were at beginning level of performance	Unacceptable No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Strategy/ Pt-Ctpoint/Crit. Thinking	Excellent Debate strategy and point - counterpoint format, critical thinking were execellently demonstrated	Very Good Debate strategy and point - counterpoint format, critical thinking were very good	Average Debate strategy and point - counterpoint format, critical thinking were average and met standards	Poor Debate strategy, point - counter-point format, critical thinking were at beginning level	Unacceptable No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Knowledge/ Content	Excellent Knowledge and content were brillantly relayed and extremely evident	Very Good Demonstrated very good mastery of knowledge and content	Average Knowledge and content were average and met standard norms	Poor Knowledge and content at beginning level	Unacceptable No assignment completed or violation of Univ. Acad. Integrity Policy