Skip to main content
iRubric: research article critique rubric

iRubric: research article critique rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
research article critique 
Rubric for an annotated bibliography consisting of 5-6 annotations of resources used to support a research paper. All citations must use APA format.
Rubric Code: JX65CXX
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Annotated Bibliography Rubric
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

3 pts

Good

5 pts

Source Selection

Poor

Fewer than five (5) sources OR five (5) sources with fewer than three (3) academically appropriate; sources are not relevant to researcher’s topic; sources necessitate extensive additional research
Fair

Five (5) sources, at least four (3) conforming to assignment guidelines; some sources chosen are relevant to the topic; writer may need additional sources to complete research
Good

Five (5) sources, all conforming to assignment guidelines; sources chosen are highly relevant to the topic; sources add greatly to research potential
Summary/Annotation

Poor

Most annotations are either too short or too long; annotations do not describe the source material; annotations offer no insight; no evidence that article has been read
Fair

Some annotations may be too short or too long; annotations adequately describe the source material, but lack insight; some evidence that article has been read
Good

Annotations succinctly and comprehensively describe the source material, the author's main point and conclusions, and offer great insight into the source material; it is evident that article has been read
Evaluation

Poor

Evaluation does not clearly explain why the sources were chosen; fails to adequately describe format/type of source; fails to evaluate and give evidence for author's authority; fails to adequately evaluate source (sponsoring organizations, publishers, etc.); fails to adequately discuss other necessary evaluation criteria (audience, objectivity, currency, accuracy, reliability/relevance, and purpose/point of view); sources are not very reliable with little justification for use
Fair

Evaluation sometimes explains why the sources were chosen; gave inadequate description of the format/type of the source; evaluated and gave some evidence for author’s authority; evaluated source (sponsoring organizations, publishers, etc.); discussed some necessary evaluation criteria (audience, objectivity, currency, accuracy, reliability/relevance, and purpose/point of view)
Good

Evaluation clearly explains why the sources were chosen; described the format/type of the source; evaluated and gave evidence for author’s authority; evaluated source (sponsoring organizations, publishers, etc.); discussed other necessary evaluation criteria (audience, objectivity, currency, accuracy, reliability/relevance, and purpose/point of view)
Credibility

Poor

Sources lack credibility
Fair

All sources are from credible, scholarly materials
Good

All sources are from credible, scholarly materials
In-text Citations

Poor

Lacking citations; unidentifiable connection to works cited; citation not close to quote/paraphrase; unclear or confusing
Fair

Connection to Works Cited is unclear or confusing; may contain basic information; may be close to quote/paraphrase
Good

Clearly and obviously show connection to the Works Cited; contain relevant information; are as close to the quote/paraphrase as possible
APA Formatting

Poor

Many errors in APA formatting rules (margins, spacing, font, headers, page numbering, etc)
Fair

A few errors in APA formatting rules (margins, spacing, font, headers, page numbering, etc)
Good

No errors in APA formatting rules (margins, spacing, font, headers, page numbering, etc)
Works Cited

Poor

Works cited has less than three (3) sources and/or there are more than four (4) errors in APA formatting
Fair

Works cited has at least three (3) sources and is formatted to APA specification with the exception of one (1) error
Good

Works cited has at least four (4) sources and is formatted to APA specifications exactly
Grammar and Mechanics

Poor

Many mechanical, grammatical, punctuation, or spelling errors
Fair

A few mechanical, grammatical, punctuation, or spelling errors
Good

Free from mechanical, grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98