Skip to main content
iRubric: Document-based Persuasive Essay w/Citations rubric

iRubric: Document-based Persuasive Essay w/Citations rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Document-based Persuasive Essay w/Citations 
Document-based Persuasive Essay w/Citations
Write a 750 word, five-paragraph persuasive argument in which you use what you have learned in this module on food to support a claim about the 'link' between nutrition and human development. You must cite at least six sources; include in-text citation and a Works Cited page; and follow the CCSS Writing and Language Standards.
Rubric Code: JX25842
By mattnee
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Persuasive Essay
  Excellent

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Claim

Excellent

The claim is clearly discernible and it is stated along with three logical reasons as part of overview. The argument is sound and consistently supported with well-chosen evidence.
Good

The claim takes a clear position. Argument and evidence may at times be strained. One support par. may veer off topic, or examples may be lacking.
Fair

The claim is weak, wordy, and/or garbled.<BR>
Argument and/or evidence is weak or does not always support the claim. Supporting pars. may veer off topic.
Poor

No claim. Argument and evidence do not connect or support one point.<BR>
Supporting paragraphs are disconnected.
Organization

Excellent

Essay is focused and organized by design.<BR>
Pars. have clear topic/concluding sentences; body paragraphs include counterarguments with refutation & effective transitions.
Good

Essay is organized. <BR>
Pars. have topic and concluding sentences; body paragraphs may incl. counterarguments and refutation, or not; and/or lack transitions; and/or lack an overall design.
Fair

Some confusion due to lack of organization. <BR>
Has weak topic and/or concluding sentence; and body paragraphs include<BR>
weak counterargument and ineffective rebuttal. Transitions are weak or absent.
Poor

No organization. Pars. have no apparent topic and/or concluding sentence; body paragraphs lack counterarguments and/or rebuttal. No transitions.
Analysis

Excellent

Claim is fully developed and supported. Evidence is vivid and relevant. Analysis shows insightful reflection with highly effective use of persuasive strategies.
Good

Claim is well developed and supported with good evidence. Analysis shows understanding with some use of persuasive strategies.
Fair

Claim is not well supported by evidence. Analysis shows partial understanding; inconsistent persuasive strategies.
Poor

Claim is not supported by evidence or analysis.
Voice & Tone

Excellent

Consistently uses a variety in word choice and sentence structure.<BR>
Strong unique voice adds polished style to the writing; tone is consistent with purpose throughout.
Good

Shows some variety in word choice and/or sentence structure.<BR>
Uses own voice, but style may be rough. Tone is consistent with purpose, but may include one or two abrupt shifts
Fair

Not enough variety in sentence structure and/or word choice.<BR>
Voice and tone are well suited, but do not stand out or are highly inconsistent.
Poor

Sentence structure is repetitive and word choice is basic. Voice is undeveloped and tone is inconsistent.
Mechanics

Excellent

Errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation are few and do not interfere with understanding.
Good

Semi-frequent errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation do not interfere with understanding.
Fair

Errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation sometimes interfere with understanding.
Poor

Errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation prevent reader from fully understanding the essay.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98