RCampus - Learning, ePortfolios, Assessments, Outcomes
Enter your login name here, or click here to go to the login page.
Enter your password:
forgot?   | click here to create a free account.
iRubric: Discussion Forum On-line Rubric

iRubric: Discussion Forum On-line Rubric

preview rubric

 

edit print email Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run apply to... delete

Discussion Forum On-line Rubric

  Derived from rubric: Discussion Forum On-line Rubric
built by Georgem

Rubric Code: FX8A7CW
The Discussion Forum is to be based on the research done prior to the discussion. It should be student guided and professionally conducted with respectful attitudes, even through addressing differing opinions. This is a professional forum and should be treated as such. Be sure to use proper grammar and punctuation.
ready Ready to use    public Public Rubric

Directly link to this rubric or embed it on your website:
url:
link:
embed:
Keywords: discussions online
Categories: Subjects: Science   Social Sciences   Vocational   Education   Nursing   (General)  
Types: Homework   Project   Assignment   ePortfolio   Reflection   (Other)  
Grade Levels: 6-8, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Online Discussion Rubric
  Excellent
10 pts
Good
8 pts
Acceptable
7 pts
Unacceptable
0 pts
Initial Assignment Posting
Explores, explains, expands upon the issue being discussed. Uses text and experience to discuss subject matter. Demonstrates analysis on various levels other than the personal.
Excellent

Posts well developed assignment that fully addresses and develops all aspects of the task.
Good

Posts well developed assignment that addresses all aspects of the task; lacks full development of concepts.
Acceptable

Posts adequate assignment with superficial thought and preparation; doesn’t address all aspects of the task.
Unacceptable

Posts no assignment.
Follow-Up Postings
Promotes interaction and asks engaging questions or makes debatable remarks.
Excellent

Demonstrates analysis of others’ posts; extends meaningful discussion by building on previous posts.
Good

Elaborates on an existing posting with further comment or observation.
Acceptable

Posts shallow contribution to discussion (e.g., agrees or disagrees); does not enrich discussion.
Unacceptable

Posts no follow-up responses to others.
Timeliness
Timeliness of discussion contributions
Excellent

Comments consistently and logically distributed throughout the discussion. Participates 4-5 times throughout the week.
Good

Comments distributed throughout the discussion. Participates 3-4 times but postings not distributed throughout week.
Acceptable

Comments neither distributed nor concentrated throughout the discussion. Participates 1-2 times on the same day.
Unacceptable

Participates not at all.
Content Contribution
Quantity of contributions
Excellent

Posts factually correct, reflective and substantive contribution;
advances discussion.
Good

Posts information that is factually correct; lacks full development of concept or thought.
Acceptable

Repeats but does not add substantive information to the discussion.
Unacceptable

Posts information that is off-topic, incorrect, or irrelevant to discussion.
References and Support
Incorporates readings, research, and personal experiences
Excellent

Uses references to readings, research, or personal experience to support comments.
Good

Incorporates some references from readings, research, and personal experience.
Acceptable

Uses personal experience, but no references to readings or research.
Unacceptable

Includes no references or supporting experience.
Professionalism
Adherence to grammar conventions and respectful interactions.
Excellent

Contributes to discussion with clear, concise comments formatted in an easy to read style that is free of grammatical or spelling errors. No unprofessional comments or behaviors
Good

Contributes valuable information to discussion with minor clarity or mechanics errors. Less than two grammar errors no unprofessional comments or behaviors
Acceptable

Communicates in friendly, courteous and helpful manner with some errors in clarity or mechanics. Less than 5 grammar errors, no unprofessional comments or behaviors
Unacceptable

Posts long, unorganized or rude content that may contain multiple errors or may be inappropriate. Unprofessional comment or behavior.
Comment
Selected two other contributions and provided response
Excellent

Applied Rubric writing to contributed response from two different students
Good

Applied Rubric writing to contributed response from at least one student
Acceptable

Partially applied Rubric to contributed response from at least one student
Unacceptable

Did not meet Rubric standard or respond to other students' cotnributions



Discuss this rubric



Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Bookmark this page:   RCampus RCampus   twit this twitter   delicious del.icio.us   digg Digg   facebook Facebook  
About Education Sites & Communities My Account Support
About RCampus
Terms of Use
Security & Privacy
Site Map
Case Studies
Classrooms
ePortfolios
Rubrics
Coursework
Grades
Book Exchange
Tutors
Website Gallery
Basic Groups
Study Groups
Club websites
Faculty Groups
My Account Settings
My Messages
My Calendar
My To-do List
My Favorites
My Documents
Free Sign up
Log in
Help & FAQ
Contact Us
Copyright © 2017 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.