Skip to main content
iRubric: Group Project: Exemplarily Leaders rubric

iRubric: Group Project: Exemplarily Leaders rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Group Project: Exemplarily Leaders 
Capstone Group Project: Analysis of a Language
As a group think about exceptional leaders you have had. What made these leaders great? Provide specific examples. Did you come up with any additional characteristics or practices that these leaders modeled? Chose one team member to write down your ideas and one member to present your ideas.
Rubric Code: CXX38A6
By jangrisano
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Group Work
  Needs Improvement

0 pts

Fair

0.5 pts

Distinctive

1.04 pts

Total

(N/A)

Group Dynamics

Needs Improvement

The group did not work well due to insufficient communication outside of class, frequent absences, or members did not provide research elements on time.
Fair

The group worked well together in class, but very little out-of-class work was completed to a high standard, did not communicate well to each other or to me, most work was completed on time
Distinctive

The group worked well together as a group, each person contributed and had a part in each stage of the project, handed in all group assignments on time, took time to prepare together for teaching demonstration.
Total
Individual Fulfilment of Role

Needs Improvement

Very little, if any, contributions to group discussions, did not fill one of the given roles, did not have individual work completed on time.
Fair

General contribution to group information gathering and discussions; some help in preparation for teaching demonstration; little participation in Blackboard activities; did not complete all tasks on time.
Distinctive

Actively and positively participated in group discussions and completed work on time, completed all individual assignments.
Total
Presentation Format

Needs Improvement

No creativity in presentation: no clear objectives in lesson, not all group members have a role, no evidence of planning or preparation for an integrated presentation, group members simply present their papers one at a time. Delivery is inaudible or distracting.
Fair

Shows evidence of some creative preparation: Some evidence of lesson objectives, group members have a role in the demonstration, but presentation is only somehwhat integrated, interaction with the class is limited. Delivery imay not be completely clear.
Distinctive

Creative integrated presentation format with obvious prior preparation and clear objectives for lesson plan: Clear role for all members of the group; obvious interaction with class. delivery is clear. .
Total
Content

Needs Improvement

There is a lack of understanding of terminology and/or concepts; therefore, the language in question is not analyzed correctly.
Fair

There is basic understanding of terminology and concepts, but the language in question is not completely analyzed correctly because of misapplication of those concepts or terms.
Distinctive

There is clear application of terminology and concepts, and the language in question is analyzed accurately.
Total
Organization

Needs Improvement

There is a lack of a clear introduction with a clear thesis statement which causes the body of the paper to be incoherent and/or lack unity. The conclusion is repetitive or lacking.
Fair

The introduction is somewhat clear, and there is a thesis statement; however, there may be a lack of specificity which causes the body of the paper to lack coherence and/or unity. There is a weak conclusion.
Distinctive

There is a clear introduction with a clear thesis statement. The body of the paper clearly explains the elements of the thesis. A conclusion which does not simply repeat the introduction is presented.
Total
Grammar and Mechanics

Needs Improvement

Sentence-level grammatical and mechanical errors intrude upon the reader's ability to comprehend the paper. Documentation style is incorrect.
Fair

Grammatical and mechanical errors do not intrude upon the reader's ability to comprehend the essay; however, sentence-level errors are numerous. Documentation style may not be correct.
Distinctive

There is grammatical control, and mechanical errors are few. Documentation style is correct.
Total





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16