Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: FINAL PRESENTATION Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
FINAL PRESENTATION Rubric
GROUP Presentation Rubric
Rubric for evaluating FINAL GROUP presentations.
Rubric Code:
CCB9BA
By
NeilTurner
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Education
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate, Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
FINAL Presentation Rubric
Poor
0-69 pts
(N/A)
Fair
70-79 pts
(N/A)
Good
80-89 pts
(N/A)
Excellent
90-100 pts
(N/A)
Research
Poor
Research did not reflect the culmination of the semester's work towards discovering all the names of known WMU alumni KIA in the Vietnam War as well as biographical data about them. Group used too few sources, and/or they were untrustworthy or inaccurate.
Fair
Group did adequate but not in-depth research of the names of known WMU alumni KIA in the Vietnam War as well as biographical data about them. Group used a few sources only, and/or they were untrustworthy or inaccurate.
Good
Group conducted thorough, accurate research from multiple, trustworthy sources of the names of known WMU alumni KIA in the Vietnam War as well as biographical data about them.
Excellent
Group's research exceeds expectations and utilizes more than three accurate, verifiable sources of the names of known WMU alumni KIA in the Vietnam War as well as biographical data about them. Group makes research discoveries unknown or unanticipated by the instructor.
Execution
Poor
Group did not turn research into a focused, professional presentation. Presentation was either far too short or too long. Some members of the group did not participate in presentation.
Fair
Group's research reflected in presentation but not focused or professional. Presentation was with one minute over or under the allotted time limit. Unequal presentation roles or presentation left to those not skilled.
Good
Group's presentation was focused, professional and reflected the culmination of their research. Presentation was within thirty seconds of the time limit over or under. Equal participation amongst all in preparation or presentation.
Excellent
Presentation was within a few seconds of time limit. Presentation was professional, focused, reflected the culmination of the students' research and exceeded expectations for the group presentations. Presentation included all group members equally.
Critical Thinking
Poor
Group applied no initiative to presentation. Presentation was basic superficial overview with no ideas or direction on student's part.
Fair
Group applied limited critical thinking to presentation, relying largely on one source to direct the nature of the presentation.
Good
Group used their own initiative and critical thinking to apply subjects and research data to shape a presentation the was comprehensive and unique.
Excellent
Group's initiative and free-thought created a presentation that was appropriate to the subjects and accurate, yet embodied a perspective unique to and created by the group as a whole.
Collaboration
Poor
Group did not work effectively to assign roles appropriately based on skill sets or to collaborate towards creating and presenting.
Fair
Groups did not appropriately assign roles based on skills or fairly delegate responsibilities. Only minimal effort to collaborate on presentation.
Good
Presentations reflect an adequate level of collaboration by student groups. Roles are assigned fairly and responsibilities are equally delegated. Ideas are mutually respected.
Excellent
Group excels at equal work delegation, positive feedback and mutual respect. Presentations reflect culmination of everyone's efforts.
Communication
Poor
Group communicated poorly with each other, could not communicate their own thoughts and feelings, offered each other little or no feedback
Fair
Group's communication was ineffective or not enough, some but not enough peer feedback, misunderstood roles or responsibilities
Good
Group utilized effective communication that resulted in quality presentation - good feedback with little instructor oversight
Excellent
Group's communication was independent and required no instructor oversight. Group's use of effective communication, peer feedback and mutual respect of ideas resulted in a high-quality presentation.
Creativity
Poor
Group applied no creativity or original thinking or ideas to their presentation.
Fair
Group applied minimal creativity or original ideas to presentation.
Good
Group applied adequate creativity to presentation - demonstrating original thinking in their approach to their presentation.
Excellent
Group's presentation excelled in creativity - using a novel, or particularly attention-getting approach.
Technical
Poor
Group used no or poor use of technology, 21st century web 2.0 tools to research, create or to present.
Fair
Minimal use by group of technology, 21st century web 2.0 tools to research, create or to present.
Good
Good use by group of technology, 21st century web 2.0 tools to research, create AND to present. Technology chosen shows adequate research as to which tools to use, not just first one found.
Excellent
Excellent use by group of technology, 21st century web 2.0 tools to research, create AND to present. Technology chosen shows detailed research as to which tools to use, not just first one found. New web 2.0 tools unknown to instructor utilized.
Keywords:
Presentation Rubric GROUP
Subjects:
Education
(General)
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Education rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.