Skip to main content
iRubric: Capstone - Technical Report rubric

iRubric: Capstone - Technical Report rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Capstone - Technical Report 
You are required to write a Technical Report in English of 8 pages minimum in Arial 11 points, spacing 1.5 maximum.
Rubric Code: BX939BX
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Project Proposal
10 % Students will submit a 1 page summary of the intent of the
project including the research question and the anticipated
project objectives.
  Excellent

7 pts

Good

5 pts

Fair

3 pts

Poor

1 pts

Research Purpose
8 %

Enter description

Excellent

The project proposal clearly defines the research question or the practical investigation, along with the project scope and sets the scene for the report to follow.
Proposal aligns with Power Engineering principles.
Good

The project proposal defines the research question or the practical investigation, along with the project scope and sets the scene for the report to follow.
Proposal aligns with Power Engineering principles.
Fair

The project proposal somewhat defines the research question or the practical investigation, along with the project scope and somewhat sets the scene for the report to follow.
Proposal mostly aligns with Power Engineering principles.
Poor

The project proposal does not clearly define the research question or the practical investigation, along with the project scope and does not set the scene for the report to follow.
Proposal does not align with Power Engineering principles.
Sentence Structure
2 %

Enter description

Excellent

Consistently clear & proper use of language. No spelling or grammar mistakes.
Good

A few errors that do not impair meaning or clarity much. 1-2 spelling and/or grammar mistakes.
Fair

Many errors that affect writing clarity or meaning. 3-5 spelling and/or grammar mistakes.
Poor

Consistently poor and unclear use of language; errors impair meaning. More than 5 spelling and/or grammar mistakes.
Capstone - Technical Report
90 %
  Excellent

7 pts

Good

5 pts

Fair

3 pts

Poor

1 pts

Organization & Readability
10 %

Excellent

Overall organization clear & develops very logically; easy to read and understand. Effective use of headings and sub-headings.
Good

Mostly clear, logical progression, a few parts hard to follow. Good use of headings and sub-headings.
Fair

Inconsistent clarity, gaps in logical development, overall hard to follow. Decent use of headings and sub-headings.
Poor

Lack of organization, incoherent development and/or unreadable. Poor use, or not using headings and sub-headings.
Sentence Structure
10 %

Grammar, spelling, capitalization, punctuation, and

Excellent

Consistently clear & proper use of technical language. No spelling or grammar mistakes.
Good

A few errors that do not impair meaning or clarity much. 1-3 spelling and/or grammar mistakes.
Fair

Many errors that affect writing clarity or meaning. 4-8 spelling and/or grammar mistakes.
Poor

Consistently poor and unclear use of language; errors impair meaning. More than 8 spelling and/or grammar mistakes.
Figures, Equations, Tables, Diagram
10 %

Excellent

Figures, Equations, Tables, Diagrams, Plots, Charts, etc are very organized, detailed & relevant.
Good

Some Figures, Equations, Tables, Diagrams, Plots, Charts, etc are not labeled properly or relevant.
Fair

Some Figures, Equations, Tables, Diagrams, Plots, Charts, etc are not labeled, illustrated properly and/or relevant.
Poor

No labels, no text references, undefined symbols, and/or unreadable. No use of Figures, Equations, Tables, Diagrams, Plots, Charts etc.
Literature Cited
10 %

Excellent

Lots of very applicable, well formatted citations.
Good

Several good, well formatted and applicable citations.
Fair

Several citations included, but vaguely relate and are poorly cited.
Poor

Very few, and any that are included are incorrectly cited or irrelevant to topic.
Title & Introduction
10 %

Excellent

The title is clear and well connected to the task. The introduction is inviting, states the main aspect of the task, and encourages the reader to complete the task. Introduction ties back to project proposal.
Good

The title is clear and well connected to the task. The introduction clearly states the main aspect of the task but does not particularly encourage the reader to engage in the task. Introduction ties back to project proposal.
Fair

The title is present but is not well connected to the task. The introduction is not well connected to the task nor is it particularly inviting to the reader. Introduction does not tie back to project proposal.
Poor

There is no title and no clear introduction of the main aspect of the task.
Discussion and Conclusions
40 %

Excellent

Presents logical discussions, describes well why various conclusions occur, and is done succinctly with few words, great clarity and reasoning presented.
Good

Presents logical explanations and findings and addresses some of the questions, not overly wordy.
Fair

Some discussion and conclusions, but findings are incorrect, poorly structured and worded, missing fundamental concepts and relationships and is very verbose - yet says little.
Poor

Missing or only provides an illogical explanation of findings and does not or incorrectly address the questions in the introduction.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16