Skip to main content
iRubric: Mathematics Department Chair Interview Rubric

iRubric: Mathematics Department Chair Interview Rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Mathematics Department Chair Interview Rubric 
Mathematics Department Chair Interview Rubric
This rubric is for a principal to use when interviewing a candidate for an assistant principal job.
Rubric Code: AX82X3W
By KODIAKSBONE1
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Math Department Cha Interview Rubri
  Excellent

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Appearance

Professional
Excellent

Appearance was professional ,well groomed - wearing a business suit/dress.
Strong handshake
Good

Appearance looked professional - but wasn't wearing proper attire.
Strong handshake.
Fair

Appearance is business casual. Handshake was not confident.
Poor

Appearance was not professional - was wearing casual clothing.
No handshake.
Interest in the Position

Confidence in Professional Career
Excellent

Candidate is well spoken, clearly states interest in position.
Interacts well with the interview committee.
Knowledgeable about responsibilities and challenges.
Good

Candidate speaks with confidence and interest.
Interaction with the interview committee is
"just okay".
Is knowledgeable about responsibilities and challenges.
Fair

Reason for position is unclear and difficult to understand. Some knowledge of responsibilities. Interacts without self confidence.
Poor

Candidate was not knowledgeable about responsibilities and challenges. Difficult to hear with very little group interaction.
Vision/Mission of Education

Knowledge/
Understanding
Excellent

Familiar with the school mission and vision.
Discusses their impact with thought provoking confidence. Addresses the committee with a strong sense of accomplishment and clarity.
Good

Familiar with the school mission and vision,
Unclear on how the mission and vision work together. Committee is addressed with enthusiasm.
Fair

Only familiar with the mission or vision. Is confident when addressing the committee. Unsure of how to impact the mission or vision as an Assistant Principal.
Poor

Unfamiliar with mission and vision of school. Confidence is low.
Committee addressed with little sense of accomplishment and thought.
Staff Development

Interaction with teaching staff, ideas and beliefs
Excellent

Clearly sights examples of staff development with outcomes. Confidently
discusses a strong sense of collaboration with teaching staff.
Gives step by step detailed procedures on staff development
Good

Sights examples of staff development.
Adequate sense of collaboration. Gives step by step procedures with little confidence.
Fair

Does not give examples of staff development. Discusses what collaboration is.
No step by step procedures given with detail.,
Poor

Does not address staff development as a prior experience.
Unable to provide the necessary steps to assist in staff development.
Strengths and Growth

Reflection and Growth as an educator
Excellent

Candidate has a clear understanding of their
leadership practices and personal opportunities. Reflects on self awareness professionally. Clear on describing top two strengths and opportunities.
Good

Candidate adequately describes their leadership practices and personal opportunities. Reflects on professional self awareness sometimes.
Only describes the strengths.
Fair

Reflects on leadership style with minimal thought. Does not reflect on professional self-awareness. Shares limited knowledge of strengths and opportunities.
Poor

Unable to offer insight to their leadership practices. Self awareness is low;
opportunities are not mentioned.
Priorities

Approach first year
Excellent

Clearly states plans for the first year as an Department Chair.
Discusses position impact on the school with confidence and determination.
Good

Names the priorities for the first year with some supporting content. Discusses position impact on school with some confidence and determination.
Fair

Names priorities for the first year without supporting content.
Does not discuss position impact on the school with confidence or determination.
Poor

Does not have a priority for the first year. Nonchalant attitude to first year approach in a new position.
Math Department Vote

Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor



Keywords:
  • Mathematics Department Chair Interview Rubric

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16