Skip to main content
iRubric: Written Assignment 1 rubric

iRubric: Written Assignment 1 rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Written Assignment 1 
This is a rubric to assess the scoring of Week 1 written assignment presenting a health topic from the secular media.
Rubric Code: AX2XC25
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Health  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Week 1 Written
  Poor

7-8

8 pts

Good

9-10

10 pts

Excellent

11-12

12 pts

Content

*Components of the Epidemiology Definition
--Distribution
--Determinants
--Deterrents
--Application
--Specified populations

Poor

The paper fails to clearly identify aspects of the definition of epidemiology that were present in the media article. It may present an extensive summary of the article alone or only touch on 1 or 2 components of the definition that were present.
Good

The paper lists the components of the epidemiology definition presented in the article. It does not present a well developed presentation of each aspect of the definition and what is presented about each component.There is little or no explanation as to why this is important or what this information adds to the topic or article. It may not present additional cited material/research. Meets the minimum requirements.
Excellent

The paper lists the components of the epidemiology definition presented in the article. It presents a detailed explanation of each component and what is presented in the article related to that element.
Week 1 Written
  Poor

0 pts

Good

1 pts

Excellent

2 pts

Component: Health Topic Summary

Poor

A summary of the topic is not presented in the paper or the information presented does not clearly describe the nature of the health topic. A topic is selected that has not a
Good

The summary provides a brief overview of the health topic. The summary states what the health problem. It may present only the description of the health topic contained in the article. No additional information on the nature or importance of the health topic to public health are presented.
Excellent

The topic summary states the nature of the health topic and describes its characteristics and the importance of the issue.
Other Items:

1 Missing Elements

Poor

The paper fails to identify aspects of the definition of epidemiology that were missing from the media article.
Good

The paper lists aspects of the epidemiology definition that were missing. There is little or no explanation as to why this is important or what this information would add to the topic or article.
Excellent

The paper lists aspects of the definition of epidemiology that were missing. It provides a good explanation of why this is important or what it would add to the knowledge of the topic or article.
Other Items:

2. Role of Epidemiology

Poor

The paper fails to present any information or explanation about the role of epidemiology in the understanding of the health topic.
Good

The describes the role of epidemiology in relation to the health issue. It presents an explanation of how epidemiology enhances knowledge of the extent of this health issue. However some of the statements may be not well developed or supported.
Excellent

The paper describes the role of epidemiology in relation to the health issue. It presents a thorough, well developed explanation of how epidemiology enhances knowledge of the extent of this health issue.
Additional Items
Standards of Writing

Poor

Paper has substantial grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation errors. APA style is not consistently used or is used incorrectly.

(-1)
Good

The quality of the writing (spelling, punctuation, and grammar) is appropriate for academic submission with few grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation errors. APA style is used with only a few errors. References and citations are usually used correctly.
(0.0)
Excellent

The quality of the posts (spelling, punctuation, and grammar) is appropriate for academic submission with no errors. APA style requirements are always followed and used correctly. No errors in references or citations.
(+1)
Research

Poor

Statements are not supported by evidence/or research. Article references are not clearly presented.
(0.0)
Good

There is no evidence of additional research. The paper does appropriately reference items from the original article.
(0.5)
Excellent

There is evidence of additional supporting research presented in the paper. Additional references that support the statement in the article are used (+1)
Other

Poor

Late submission (-1 pt per day).
Good
Excellent



Keywords:
  • Online Discussion


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98