Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Personal Theory of Counseling Paper rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Personal Theory of Counseling Paper
Personal Theory of Counseling Paper
Use this rubric for grading class assignments. Can be customized for any subject.
Rubric Code:
ZXW59B3
By
TFlorio
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Psychology
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Criterion
Beginning
10 pts
Approaching
15 pts
Meeting
20 pts
Exceeding
25 pts
The Nature of People
Beginning
-Content is incomplete.
- Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.
- Questions were not adequately answered.
Approaching
- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
- Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Meeting
- Content is accurate and persuasive.
- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Exceeding
- Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive.
- Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.
- Responses are excellent, timely and address assignment including course concepts.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
The Nature of Problems
Beginning
-Content is incomplete.
- Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.
- Questions were not adequately answered.
Approaching
- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
- Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Meeting
- Content is accurate and persuasive.
- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Exceeding
- Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive.
- Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.
- Responses are excellent, timely and address assignment including course concepts.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Process of Change
Beginning
-Content is incomplete.
- Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.
- Questions were not adequately answered.
Approaching
- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
- Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Meeting
- Content is accurate and persuasive.
- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Exceeding
- Content is accurate and persuasive.
- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
My Theory in Practice
Beginning
-Content is incomplete.
- Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.
- Questions were not adequately answered.
Approaching
- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
- Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Meeting
- Content is accurate and persuasive.
- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Exceeding
- Content is accurate and persuasive.
- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Multicultural Considerations
Beginning
-Content is incomplete.
- Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.
- Questions were not adequately answered.
Approaching
- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
- Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Meeting
- Content is accurate and persuasive.
- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Exceeding
- Content is accurate and persuasive.
- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Strengths and Limitations
Beginning
-Content is incomplete.
- Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.
- Questions were not adequately answered.
Approaching
- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
- Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Meeting
- Content is accurate and persuasive.
- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Exceeding
- Content is accurate and persuasive.
- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of assignment are clearly articulated.
Enter Title
Enter Title
25 pts
Enter Title
30 pts
Enter Title
35 pts
Enter Title
40 pts
APA Style & Appropriate Sources
Enter Title
-APA style is not used
- sources are not cited and/or referenced
- sources are not scholarly or inadequate
Enter Title
-Some APA formatting used
- some sources cited & referenced correctly
- some sources appropriate
Enter Title
- Attempt to use APA format throughout is clear
- sources mostly cited and refernced correctly
-sources are adequate and appropriate
Enter Title
- APA style used almost perfectly
- citations and references all correctly formatted
- sources go above minimum and are used in sophisticated ways
Enter Title
Enter Title
4 pts
Enter Title
6 pts
Enter Title
8 pts
Enter Title
10 pts
Coherence & Analyses
Enter Title
- Assignment lacks many elements of correct formatting.
- Assignment is inadequate in length/depth of thought.
-- Analyses
are not included.
Enter Title
- Assignment follows most guidelines.
-- Insufficient analyses are included.
-Analyses do not adequately address the questions posed.
-Analyses are not well organized or clear.
Enter Title
- Assignment follows designated guidelines.
- Assignement is the appropriate length.
-Format is good.
-Analyses are sufficient in number but may not be well organized or as clear as they could be.
posed.
Enter Title
- Assignment follows all designated guidelines.
- Assignment is the appropriate length/depth of thought.
-Format enhances readability of work.
-Analyses are organized logically, clearly presented, titled properly, easy to understand by a lay reader, and directly address the questions posed
Subjects:
Accounting
Arts and Design
Biology
Business
Chemistry
Communication
Computers
Dance
Engineering
English
Finance
Foreign Languages
Geography
Geology
Health
History
Humanities
Journalism
Law
Math
Medical
Music
Philosophy
Physical Ed., Fitness
Physics
Political Science
Psychology
Science
Social Sciences
Vocational
(General)
Types:
Exam
Homework
Project
Presentation
Assignment
Writing
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Accounting rubrics
More Exam rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.