Skip to main content
iRubric: Event Management & Operations Presentation rubric

iRubric: Event Management & Operations Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Event Management & Operations Presentation 
Assessment rubric for graduate students on Event Management & Operations (with Risk Management) Presentations for KIN 553 Facility, Event and Risk Management in Sports.
Rubric Code: ZX46B43
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Sport Facilities Visit Presentation
  Excellent

4 pts

Very Good

3 pts

Average

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Unacceptable

0 pts

Topic/ Preparation/ Research

Excellent

Topic selection, preparation, research were excellently displayed
Very Good

Topic selection, preparation, research were very evident
Average

Topic selection, preparation, research were average and met standards
Poor

Topic selection, preparation, or research were at the beginning level
Unacceptable

No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Appearance/ Poise

Excellent

Appearance and poise were excellent and displayed extreme confidence
Very Good

Appearance and poise were professional
Average

Appearance and poise were average and met standard norms
Poor

Appearance not professional and presenter not poised
Unacceptable

No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Introduction/ Purpose

Excellent

Introduction and purpose were excellently executed
Very Good

Introduction and purpose were very well executed
Average

Introduction and purpose were average and met standard norms
Poor

Introduction and purpose were at beginning level of performance
Unacceptable

No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Depth of Project / CriticalThinking

Excellent

Depth of project and critical thinking were execellently demonstrated
Very Good

Depth of project and critical thinking were very good
Average

Depth of project and critical thinking were average and met standards
Poor

Depth of project and critical thinking were at beginning level
Unacceptable

No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Knowledge/ Content

Excellent

Knowledge and content were brillantly relayed and extremely evident
Very Good

Demonstrated very good mastery of knowledge and content
Average

Knowledge and content were average and met standard norms
Poor

Knowledge and content at beginning level
Unacceptable

No assignment completed or violation of Univ. Acad. Integrity
Policy
Presentation/ Delivery Style

Excellent

Presentation and delivery excellent with superb eye contact, voice projection and confident
posture
Very Good

Eye contact, voice projection and posture in presentation were very good
Average

Presentation and delivery were average and met standard norms
Poor

Poor eye contact, voice projection or posture in presentation
Unacceptable

No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity
Policy
Creativity (Visual Aids & Handouts)

Excellent

Use of aids was extremely creative and demonstrated with technology
Very Good

Use of aids kept interest of audience and was very well executed
Average

Creativity was average and met standard norms
Poor

Lacks creativity
Unacceptable

No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Organization/ Flow/ Time

Excellent

Organizational skills were exceptional and the flow of the presentation and time execution were excellent
Very Good

Organizational skills, flow of presentation and time utilization were very good
Average

Presentation organization, flow, or time utilization were average and met standard norms
Poor

Presentation was poorly organized, confusing or did not utilize time well
Unacceptable

No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Finish/ Conclusions/ Recomendations

Excellent

Finish, conclusions, or recommendations were excellent and superbly executed
Very Good

Finish, conclusions, or recomendations were greatly evident and very good
Average

Finish, conclusions, or recomendations were average and met standard norms
Poor

Finish, conclusions, or recommendations were at begining level
Unacceptable

No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Assignment Execution

Excellent

Assignment execution was excellent
Very Good

Assignemnt was very well executed
Average

Assignemnt was executed on the average level and met standard norms
Poor

Assignment performance was executed at beginning level
Unacceptable

No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy



Keywords:
  • Sport managment, facilities, event management, event operations, risk management


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98