Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Engineering Design Process: Trash to Toys rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Engineering Design Process: Trash to Toys
Engineering Design Process: Kinect Cars
This rubric is used to assess the students' use of the engineering design process for designing toys from trash. Limitations:Toy must be 30-100cm, all parts must be securely fitted together using only non-toxic tape (duct tape), only non-toxic paints (most acrylics), have no sharp edged or protruding edges. contain mainly RECYCLABLE materials (not including the duct tape), have at least 3 different materials.
Rubric Code:
ZX282X3
By
Rosebud7012
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Engineering
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
K-5, 6-8, 9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Engineering Design Process
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Plan
Poor
You did not plan what you were going to build nor plan on what materials to use.
Fair
Some evidence of a plan. There was some thought to materials/building, but not really thought out.
Good
Good evidence of planning done. Materials were listed and thought out, but the plan wasn't quite complete.
Excellent
All materials were listed and well thought out. I can't wait to see how you build your toy for Winter.
Design
Poor
Your design lacked materials that were needed. It was really hard for me to tell what you built or were building.
Fair
Some materials were used correctly. The toy lacked creativity and there were parts that weren't secure.
Good
Good use of the materials and plan. The toy was nice and well put together, but there were parts that weren't secure.
Excellent
Great use of materials! You maximized your use of materials and created a great toy for Winter.
Time Management
Poor
Did not use time well. Time was wasted during the plan, and design phase of engineering.
Fair
Sometimes used time well. There were times when the group got off task during the plan, and design phase.
Good
Good use of time, there were a few times when the group got off task, but for the majority of the task time was well spent.
Excellent
Great use of time. The group stayed on task during each phase of the process.
Participation
Poor
You had to be reminded several times to stay on task.
Fair
You participated during the building process. The group had to be redirected a few times.
Good
You worked together and didn't have to be redirected that much at all.
Excellent
You worked together flawlessly and got the job done. The group never had to be redirected.
Keywords:
engineering, toys from trash
Subjects:
Engineering
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Engineering rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.