Skip to main content
iRubric: Resume / Cover Letter rubric

iRubric: Resume / Cover Letter rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Resume / Cover Letter 
Rubric Code: XXC72W2
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Communication  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Resume
  Excellent

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Okay

2 pts

Needs Improvement

1 pts

Resume
Style & Appearance

Excellent

• Fills one page without crowding
• Font style and size are readable and appropriate to the task
• Personal contact information is easily accessible and "pops" for the reader
• Formatting and styling makes resume stand out from the pack, without being flashy or distracting
Good

• Fills one page with some crowding
• Font style and size are readable, though a more professional typeface could have been chosen
• Personal contact information is easily accessible
• Formatting and styling makes the resume stand out, but could be a little more understated.
Okay

• Marginally exceeds one page, or falls noticeably short of one page with large gaps or oversized font.
• Font style and size are either challenging to read, or they do not reflect the level of professionalism required
• Personal contact information is not immediately accessible, or it is difficult to see
• Formatting and styling borders on flashy and distracting, or it has some elements of personality, but is mostly bland or unremarkable
Needs Improvement

• Either far exceeds one page, or is far short of one page
• Font style and size are nearly unreadable, or are very unprofessional for the task
• Personal contact information is missing, or is lost among other information on the resume
• Formatting and style are either unprofessionally flashy and distracting, or it is so bland as to not stand out at all.
Education Section

Excellent

• Entries start from most recent activity to oldest activity
• Names and locations of schools/facilities are listed
• Dates are included for each educational span
• Extremely relevant coursework, projects, and activities are included in bullet points
Good

• Entries start from most recent activity to oldest activity
• Names and locations of schools/facilities are listed, with one or two minor errors or omissions
• Dates are included for educational span, with minor error in formatting
• Coursework, projects, and activities are included as bullet points, but could be more clearly relevant.
Okay

• Entries are mostly in the correct order, with some mislabeled or mixed up information
• Some information may be missing for the names and locations of the schools/facilities
• Some dates are included, or those that are have obvious errors in formatting
• Coursework, projects, and activities are included, but relevance to job is difficult to determine
• Some information is written as full sentences, rather than bullet points
Needs Improvement

• Entries are not listed from most recent activity to oldest.
• Names and locations are not listed for the schools/facilities
• Dates are either not included, or are formatted incorrectly.
• Coursework, projects, and activities are not included, or those that are lack any relevance to the job
• Information is written as full sentences, rather than as bullet pointed information beginning with a verb.
Experience Section

Excellent

• Entries start from most recent activity to oldest activity
• Names and locations of facilities are listed
• Dates are included for each work experience span
• Extremely relevant duties, activities, certifications, or awards are included in bullet points
Good

• Entries start from most recent activity to oldest activity
• Names and locations of facilities are listed, with one or two minor errors or omissions
• Dates are included for each work experience span, with minor error in formatting
• Duties, activities, certifications, and awards are included as bullet points, but could be more clearly relevant.
Okay

• Entries are mostly in the correct order, with some mislabeled or mixed up information
• Some information may be missing for the names and locations of the facilities.
• Some dates are included, or those that are have obvious errors in formatting
•Some duties, activities, certifications, and awards are listed, but it's hard to get a sense of what the experience entailed.
• Some information is written as full sentences, rather than bullet points
Needs Improvement

• Entries are not listed from most recent activity to oldest.
• Names and locations are not listed for the facilities
• Dates are either not included, or are formatted incorrectly.
•Duties, activities, certifications, and awards are not included, or those that are lack any relevance to the job being applied for.
• Information is written as full sentences, rather than as bullet pointed information beginning with a verb.
Skills / Interests Section

Excellent

• Listings are highly relevant to the job the applicant is seeking
• Skills and interests are listed as activities that prove a quality, or that provide clear and measurable skill sets.
• Listings are concise and bullet pointed
• When possible, levels of proficiency are listed for skills
Good

• Listings are closely relevant to the job the applicant is seeking
• Skills and interests are listed as activities that show a quality or indicate a skill set.
• Listings are bullet pointed
• Many skills have levels of proficiency listed, but one or two could be quantified.
Okay

• Listings are loosely relevant to the job the applicant is seeking
• Skills and interests are listed mostly as qualities of the applicant, hinting at a particular skill set.
• Listings are wordy
• A few skills have levels of proficiency listed, but most are unquantified
Needs Improvement

• Listings are not relevant to the job the applicant is seeking
• Skills and interests are listed as qualities of the applicant, with no hint toward proof of claim or a particular skill set.
• Listings are full sentences
• Skills are unquantified with no levels of proficiency listed
Technical Elements

Excellent

• No spelling errors
• No punctuation errors
• No capitalization errors
• No personal pronouns

• Strong action verbs
Good

• 1-2 errors throughout resume

• Adequate action verbs
Okay

• 3-4 errors throughout resume

• Weak action verbs
Needs Improvement

• 5+ errors throughout resume

• No action verbs




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98