Skip to main content
iRubric: Engineering Field Report rubric

iRubric: Engineering Field Report rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Engineering Field Report 
Rubric Code: X82C2
By jocrawfo
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Types of Engineering Report
Enter rubric description
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Title Page
1 pts

Enter criteria description
Poor

60% or more of the components necessary for a complete title page exist.
Fair

80% or more of the components necessary for a complete title page exist.
Good

All components required for the title page exist and are located correctly.
Abstract
2 pts

Enter criteria description
Poor

Does not completely explain the report in a concise manner. Purpose and objective of the work are unclear.
Fair

Does not completely explain the report in a concise manner. Purpose of the work is stated.
Good

Approximately one paragraph. Tells detailed information about the report. Contains objectives of the work.
Table of Contents
1 pts

Enter criteria description
Poor

Table of contents exists. But page numbers and sections are missing or inaccurate.
Fair

Table of contents exists but is missing page numbers or sections that are required.
Good

Table of contents exists with page numbers and all required sections of the report listed.
Introduction
2 pts

Poor

Is wordy or lacking information. Material is not related to what is in the report.
Fair

Is either wordy, lacking information or not related to the material in the report.
Good

Short brief explanation of the activity is complete and accurate with appropriate thesis statement.
Description of Field
1 pts

Poor

Description of the field is inaccurate and does not provide the reader any insight into the field.
Fair

Description of the field is given, but does not accurately or fully detail the field.
Good

Field of engineering is described fully and accurately with insight into duties, work activities, environment, and conditions.
Job Prospects
1 pts

Poor

List of prospects given with no discussion provided.
Fair

At least one job prospect is given and discussed.
Good

Two job prospects are listed with a discussion of why the prospects were given.
Career Demand
1 pts

Poor

Demand is addressed, but no support is given and no geographic information provided.
Fair

Demand for this type of engineer is discussed, but little support is given, including geographic areas.
Good

Current demand for this type of engineer is fully explored. Statistical data is provided. Geographic needs are addressed.
Salary Ranges
1 pts

Poor

Salaries are provided, but no range or description of salary levels change is given.
Fair

Salary Range Provided. Little or no discussion of how experience effects salary is given.
Good

Salary range provided. How experience level alters the salary or the engineer is presented with statistical data.
Education / College Comparison
1 pts

Poor

University information is given, but not compared. No mention of courses.
Fair

Universities are discussed, but not adequately compared. No referrence to the courses in the appendix.
Good

Two universities offering this type of engineering are selected and compared. Listing of courses required to recieve degree referred to in appendix.
Materials
1 pts

Poor

60% of materials used are listed.
Fair

80% of materials used are listed.
Good

All materials are listed.
Procedure
1 pts

Poor

Step-by-step is out of order or parts are missing. Graphics are unnecessary or missing. Lacks detail to explain the procedure.
Fair

A step-by-step procedure exists. Some sketches, photos, schematics, equations, etc. are not necessary. Uses some pronouns. Some details missing.
Good

The step-by-step process is laid out exactly as done by the student. Sketches, photos, schematics, equations, etc. are shown where appropriate. All procedures are explained in detail and written in the third person.
Conclusion
2 pts

Poor

Student has a summary that does not match the work in the activity.
Fair

Summary is too long or does not explain what the student accomplished.
Good

Student has a summary of what he/she learned and what the activity was all about.
Appendix - College Information
1 pts

Poor

Appendix haphazardly placed in paper with unnecessary information or information that does not belong.
Fair

Appendix holds information that does not belong. Appendix is labeled incorrectly.
Good

Appendix is correctly titled and positioned, all college course information from both colleges are provided.
Appendix - Interview
2 pts

Poor

Interview is provided, but missing most information and no reflection given.
Fair

Written copy of a personal interview with an engineer from the field is provided. Most of the required information is provided.
Good

Written copy of a personal interview with an engineer from the field is provided. All required information from the interviewee is provided. Discussion of the interview and the value of the information gathered is given.
Citations
2 pts

Poor

Few sources that were used are cited and the format has not been followed.
Fair

Some of the sources the student used are not cited and may not formatted correctly.
Good

All information gathered by the student has been cited with the proper format.
Written Report Format
4 pts

Poor

Report has many mistakes in grammar and spelling with no evidence of proof reading. Font size and margins are inappropriately used. Pronouns were used freely throughout the report.
Fair

Report has a few mistakes in grammar and spelling. Report is typed, but has some areas where fonts are excessively large or small. A few pronouns were used.
Good

Report was written in professional manner with no personal pronouns and appropriate grammer, spelling, and evidence of proof reading. Report is typed neatly with appropriate fonts and margins.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98