iRubric: Golden Ratio Rubric

Golden Ratio Rubric

A rubric to evaluate students presentations about the "Golden Ratio"

Rubric Code: X55369

By tngarver

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 6-8

Golden Ratio Rubric
	Exemplary 3 pts	Proficient 2 pts	Good 1 pts	Poor 0 pts
Pre-Planning-Storyboard 10 %	Exemplary The storyboard has sketches of each slide including: the title, text, colors, graphics, sounds, and hyperlinks. All the slides are numbered and in a sequence that is logical.	Proficient The storyboard has sketches of each slide that includes the title and the text and they are in sequential order.	Good The storyboard is not in any particular order and some of the slides are missing or not labeled.	Poor The storyboard is incomplete or missing with no logical sequence.
Content 30 %	Exemplary The content is written clearly. It has accurately addressed ALL five questions in the task.	Proficient The content is present. The student has accurately addressed 3-4 of the questions in the task.	Good The content is limited and some of the information is not useful to the topic. Only 1-2 of the questions were accurately addressed.	Poor The content is lacking and has not accurately addressed any of the five questions.
Organization 20 %	Exemplary Logical and instinctive sequence of all the information presented. The paths and titles to all the information are clear and direct with labels.	Proficient Logical sequence of all the information presented. The paths and titles to all the information are clear and direct with labels.	Good Some logical sequence of the information presented but some of the titles and paths are confusing or not correctly labeled.	Poor No logical sequence of the information presented. Many of the titles and paths are not labeled or clear.
Originality 10 %	Exemplary The product shows significant evidence of originality and creativity. Most of the images and the ideas are above and beyond what the research sites provided.	Proficient The product shows evidence of originality and creativity. Some of the images and ideas are above and beyond what the research sites provided.	Good The product shows minimal evidence of originality and creativity. Most of the images and ideas are from the research sites provided.	Poor The product shows no evidence of originality and creativity. All of the images and ideas are from the research sites provided.
Graphics, Sounds, and/or Animation 10 %	Exemplary The graphics, sounds, and/or animations add significantly to the presentation. All of the graphics, sounds, and/or animations help to enhance the understanding of the ideas presented in the project.	Proficient The graphics, sounds, and/or animations add to the presentation. Some of the graphics, sounds, and/or animations help to enhance the understanding of the ideas presented in the project.	Good Some of the graphics, sounds, and/or animations do not add to the presentation or are unrelated. Some of the graphics, sounds, and/or animations do not enhance the understanding of the ideas presented in the project.	Poor None of the graphics, sounds, and/or animations add to the presentation and/or are unrelated to the topic. The graphics, sounds, and/or animations do not enhance the understanding of the ideas presented in the project.
Sources 10 %	Exemplary Sources of information, graphics, sounds, and/or animation are properly cited and the audience can easily determine where the information and graphics came from. All of the added sources have authority and creditability.	Proficient Sources of information, graphics, sounds, and/or animation are properly cited. Some of the added sources have authority and creditability.	Good Sources of information, graphics, sounds, and/or animation are not always properly cited and the audience cannot easily determine where the information and graphics came from. There are not many added sources that have authority and creditability.	Poor Sources of information, graphics, sounds, and/or animation are not properly cited and the audience cannot determine where the information and graphics came from. There are no addition sources.
Writing Mechanics 10 %	Exemplary The text is clearly written with no errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.	Proficient The text is clearly written with little amount of errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.	Good Spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors distract or impair readability (3 or more errors)	Poor Errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, usage and grammar repeatedly distract the reader. Editing and revision is required (5 or more errors)

Keywords:

ratio

Subjects:

Education

Types:

Project

Build free rubrics at www.iRubric.com. Design, share, assess, collaborate.

Rubric Code: X55369