Skip to main content
iRubric: Laboratory Reports rubric

iRubric: Laboratory Reports rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Laboratory Reports 
Laboratory Reports
This is the grading rubric for Electronics Engineering Lab Reports
Rubric Code: WX939B4
By tebbiechale
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Lab Report
  Exemplary/Excellent

10 pts

Accomplished/Good

8 pts

Developing/Fair

5 pts

Unacceptable/Poor

2 pts

Score

(N/A)

Equivalent Weight

(N/A)

Writing Mechanics
30 %
Grammar, sentence/paragraph mechani
10 %

Exemplary/Excellent

Consistently clear & proper use of language
Accomplished/Good

A few errors that do not impair meaning or clarity much
Developing/Fair

Many errors that affect writing clarity or meaning
Unacceptable/Poor

Consistently poor and unclear use of language; errors impair meaning
Score
Equivalent Weight
Figures, Equations, Tables, Diagram
5 %

Exemplary/Excellent

Figures, Equations, Tables, Diagrams, Plots, Charts, etc are very organized and detailed.
Accomplished/Good

Some Figures, Equations, Tables, Diagrams, Plots, Charts, etc are not labeled properly.
Developing/Fair

Some Figures, Equations, Tables, Diagrams, Plots, Charts, etc are not labeled and illustrated properly.
Unacceptable/Poor

No labels, no text references, undefined symbols, and/or unreadable
Score
Equivalent Weight
Units & Significant Figures
5 %

Exemplary/Excellent

Data tables formatted correctly with headings; proper use of units and significant figures
Accomplished/Good

Some data tables with no headings, quantities with no units or wrong significant figures
Developing/Fair

Many data tables with no headings, quantities with no units or wrong significant figures
Unacceptable/Poor

Disorganized data with no headings, quantities with wrong or no units, figures misleading
Score
Equivalent Weight
Organization & Readability
10 %

Exemplary/Excellent

Overall organization clear & develops very logically; easy to read and understand
Accomplished/Good

Mostly clear, logical progression, a few parts hard to follow
Developing/Fair

Inconsistent clarity, gaps in logical development, overall hard to follow
Unacceptable/Poor

Lack of organization, incoherent development and/or unreadable
Score
Equivalent Weight
Technical Quality of Content
70 %
Objectives & Planning
10 %

Exemplary/Excellent

Fully outlines all objectives, addresses any changes clearly; identifies and describes planning timeline
Accomplished/Good

States objectives, identifies planning timeline with some description
Developing/Fair

States objectives unclearly, identifies planning timeline without description
Unacceptable/Poor

Missing objectives, planning timeline and/or description
Score
Equivalent Weight
Methods & Calculations
20 %

Exemplary/Excellent

Fully explains all methods, techniques, measurements and calculations made
Accomplished/Good

Mostly explains methods, techniques, measurements and calculations made
Developing/Fair

Methods, techniques, measurements and calculations identified but incomplete
Unacceptable/Poor

Methods and/or calculations missing or faulty
Score
Equivalent Weight
Discussion of Results
25 %

Exemplary/Excellent

Presented clearly and concisely; completes all objectives; assesses impact. Easy to read and understand.
Accomplished/Good

Results presented; objectives mostly complete. Readable and understandable.
Developing/Fair

Some results presented; objectives partially met. Some parts hard to read or understand.
Unacceptable/Poor

Results unclear, erroneous or partially missing; objectives not met. Some parts impossible to read or understand.
Score
Equivalent Weight
Conclusions
15 %

Exemplary/Excellent

Fully explains any conclusions with clear rationale, citing all relevant data, measurements and/or calculations. Describes systematic process of decision making; includes array of alternatives considered.
Accomplished/Good

Explains conclusions with mostly clear rationale, citing some relevant data, measurements and/or calculations. Describes process of decision making; includes alternatives considered.
Developing/Fair

Explains some conclusions and/or some rationale. Cites some relevant data, measurements and/or calculations. Describes some decision making; includes at least one alternative.
Unacceptable/Poor

Conclusions not fully explained and/or lack sufficient rationale or support. Relevant data, measurements and/or calculations missing. Decision making faulty or does not include alternatives.
Score
Equivalent Weight
Total
100 %
Interpretation
100 %

Exemplary/Excellent
Accomplished/Good
Developing/Fair
Unacceptable/Poor
Score
Equivalent Weight



Keywords:
  • Engineering, Report

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98