Skip to main content
iRubric: Classical/Baroque Composer Presentation rubric

iRubric: Classical/Baroque Composer Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Classical/Baroque Composer Presentation 
Rubric Code: WX8B966
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: History  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Baroque/Classical Composer
100 %
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Factual Content
20 %

Poor

Some knowledge presented, but this is largely "undigested" and is not always relevant; evidence of "copy/paste" approach; limited evidence of research. Limited understanding evident.
Fair

Adequate evidence of relevant knowledge, some of it expressed in "own words"; evidence of adequate research. Sometimes not well explained to audience.
Good

Good evidence of relevant knowledge mostly expressed in "own words"; evidence of significant research. Generally well understood by presenters and audience.
Excellent

The information presented was accurate and complete without being too detailed. The information presented was clearly well understood by the presenters and not just copy/pasted from the internet. The information presented was clearly understood by the audience. There was clear evidence of wide research.
Analysis
20 %

Poor

There is no analysis
Fair

There is an attempt at analysis aimed at answering the key questions, but it is weak and generally unsupported
Good

There is a sustained attempt at analysis aimed at answering the key questions and this is generally successful, although it may lack depth/supporting evidence.
Excellent

There is a sustained and in-depth analysis of the key questions which produces clear and well-supported answers.
Presentation Skills
10 %

Poor

Little evidence of preparation; little or no attention to presentation skills; no audience participation
Fair

Some evidence of presentation skills (eye contact, varied tone, etc). Little attempt to encourage audience participation. Mostly clearly explained.
Good

Good evidence of presentations skills (eye contact, varied tone, etc) Some attempt to encourage audience participation. Clearly explained.
Excellent

The presentation was clearly and confidently presented. The presenters were you
well-prepared and seemed to have practiced their presentation beforehand. Presenters explained their material clearly. Presenters skilfully used presentation
skills such as eye contact and varied tone to engage the audience. Presenters encouraged
audience participation through asking questions, etc.
Reflection
10 %

Poor

The reflection showed little though or evidence.
Fair

The reflection showed some thought about the purpose of the project and how well/badly this had been achieved; some of the reflection lacked depth and/or supporting evidence; the self-assessment and peer assessment lacked depth and/or evidence.
Good

The individual reflection made some good points but was sometimes superficial and lacking in development/explanation/evidence; the self-assessment and the assessment of classmates' contributions could have been better supported and more extensive.
Excellent

The individual refection was thoughtful and complete; the assessment of classmates' contributions and the self-assessment were honest and appropriate, and supported by specific evidence.
Slide quality
10 %

Poor

The slides and crowded and difficult to read. There is no visual material. Links do not work well.
Fair

The slides are sometimes crowded and difficult to read; there is a lack of visual material; some of the links do not work
Good

Slides are not crowded and are easy to read; there is appropriate visual material; the slides are generally pleasing to look at; the links all work.
Excellent

Exemplary work. Exceeds expectations.
Group Work
10 %

Poor

Group was not observed to be working well together during class time; there was little effective division of work in the presentation.
Fair

Group was observed to be working well most of the time during class time with some lapses; not all members were on task and using their time wisely; there was some attempt to divide up the work during the presentation
Good

The group worked consistently well during class time and there was clear evidence of combined effort and cooperation; all group members remained on task consistently.
Excellent

There was clear evidence of constructive leadership and division of tasks; all group members clearly knew what they were supposed to be doing at all times; during the presentation itself, each group member participated fully and effectively.
Music Choice
10 %

Poor

The choice of music did not follow the criteria set.
Fair

The music did meet the criteria set but could have been more varied and/or more suitable to illustrate different aspects of the composer's work.
Good

The music met all the requirements set and effectively illustrated different aspects of the composer's work.
Excellent

The choice of music was imaginative and fully illustrated the most important aspects/characteristics of the composer's work.
Overall Impression
10 %

Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent




Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16