Skip to main content
iRubric: Grading Group work rubric

iRubric: Grading Group work rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Grading Group work 
Create Your Own Ending Group Project
Grading how the group did as a whole and how each individual did as team member.
Rubric Code: WX83A83
By rvasquez89
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12

Powered by iRubric Group Work
  Needs Improvement

10 pts

Fair

30 pts

Distinctive

50 pts

Performance

Needs Improvement

Not all group members have a role, no evidence of planning or preparation, group does not take performance seriously
Fair

Most group members have a role in the performance, shows evidence of some preparation, group takes performance seriously for the most part
Distinctive

Each group member has a role in the performance, performance shows evidence of planning and preparation, performance is creative, performance is taken seriously by group
Effort

Needs Improvement

Very little effort. Put off the project to the last minute. Didn't want to participate as a group. Had a hard time communicating to each other. Had to rush to get the project done.
Fair

Most of the group put in good effort and had enough time to review and look over project as a group.
Distinctive

Everyone put in great effort and was able to go over the final project more then once as a group. Communication was easy to do as a group and everyone put in the same level of effort.
Participation Member 1
  Needs Improvement

10 pts

Fair

30 pts

Distinctive

50 pts

Name:
Individual participation

Needs Improvement

Very little, if any, contributions to group discussions, exhibited a negative attitude during discussions, did not fill one of the given roles, did not have individual work completed on time
Fair

Contributed to group discussions on occasion, did not exhibit a negative attitude but did not offer much positive feedback either, completed most assignments, took on a role but did not complete all of the tasks assigned to that role
Distinctive

Actively and positively participated in group discussions and completed work on time, took on one of the given roles for the performance and for the day-to-day group work,
completed all individual assignments
Group collaboration

Needs Improvement

Negative attitudes towards each other, arguing during discussions, late submissions of work, lack of preparation for final performance
Fair

Worked well together in class, but very little out-of-class work was completed to a high standard, did not communicate well to each other or to me, most work was completed on time
Distinctive

Worked well together as a group, no arguing or negative communication, allowed each person to contribute and have a part in each stage of the project, handed in all group assignments on time, took time to prepare together for final performance
Participation Member 2
Name:
Individual participation

Needs Improvement

Very little, if any, contributions to group discussions, exhibited a negative attitude during discussions, did not fill one of the given roles, did not have individual work completed on time
Fair

Contributed to group discussions on occasion, did not exhibit a negative attitude but did not offer much positive feedback either, completed most assignments, took on a role but did not complete all of the tasks assigned to that role
Distinctive

Actively and positively participated in group discussions and completed work on time, took on one of the given roles for the performance and for the day-to-day group work,
completed all individual assignments
Group collaboration

Needs Improvement

Negative attitudes towards each other, arguing during discussions, late submissions of work, lack of preparation for final performance
Fair

Worked well together in class, but very little out-of-class work was completed to a high standard, did not communicate well to each other or to me, most work was completed on time
Distinctive

Worked well together as a group, no arguing or negative communication, allowed each person to contribute and have a part in each stage of the project, handed in all group assignments on time, took time to prepare together for final performance




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98